Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v2.1.8

2011-05-04 Thread Alan M. Carroll
+1

Thanks! ATS built fine on Ubunto 9.10

2011-05-04 Thread Suzanna Schmeelk
Hi All, Thank you so much for your help yesterday! I got ATS built on Ubunto 9.10. Great documentation. The logfile is attached. If I'm wrong at it didn't build correctly, please feel free to let me know! f -march=i586 -rdynamic -o update_records update_records.o ../proxy/mgmt2/librec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v2.1.8

2011-05-04 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 05/02/2011 11:11 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Hi all, I've prepared a package for a v2.1.8 release. Please take a look at the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate, please cast your ±/0 votes, I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v2.1.8

2011-05-04 Thread Billy Vierra
My bad guys, I see now that the way the configs are done is changed in 2.1.8 (to removes the .default if there isnt a file there, which it did not do in 2.1.7) On 05/04/11 11:33, Billy Vierra wrote: Were the .default files removed in this release (they were there in 2.1.7) mv: cannot stat `/et

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v2.1.8

2011-05-04 Thread Billy Vierra
Were the .default files removed in this release (they were there in 2.1.7) mv: cannot stat `/etc/trafficserver/ae_ua.config.default': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `/etc/trafficserver/cache.config.default': No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `/etc/trafficserver/cluster.config.

Re: a simple plugin that writes to the cache

2011-05-04 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 05/04/2011 11:24 AM, John Plevyak wrote: The way the regex query works is that it scans the cache on disk. However, it does not scan the write aggregation buffer which is probably where you document is. You might want to file that as a bug Also (and John probably knows this better t

Re: a simple plugin that writes to the cache

2011-05-04 Thread John Plevyak
The way the regex query works is that it scans the cache on disk. However, it does not scan the write aggregation buffer which is probably where you document is. You might want to file that as a bug In the meantime, if you do a Lookup instead of a regex scan it should find it because tha

a simple plugin that writes to the cache

2011-05-04 Thread Kevin Giles
Hi, I have written a plug to write an entry to the cache on the HTTP_SEND_RESPONSE_HDR_HOOK. It appears to work fine, the plugin is receiving the correct events, but when I inspect the cache using the cache regex lookup my entry does not appear? It is just a simple test to write an entry t