Re: Should we enable TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT by default?

2010-11-29 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 11/29/2010 05:15 PM, Igor Galić wrote: HTTPD also supports FreeBSD's far surprior accept filters: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accept_filter This can provide an entire HTTP requests. So maybe in the light of the possibility it would make some sense to give the config option a neu

Re: Should we enable TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT by default?

2010-11-29 Thread Igor Galić
- "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > Right now, if available (e.g. on Linux) we have support for this, but > > it's disabled (set to 0) by default. Are there any reasons why we > shouldn't make this enabled by default? I looked at various HTTPD > versions, HTTPD v2.3.x sets the timeout to "30s", wh

Should we enable TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT by default?

2010-11-29 Thread Leif Hedstrom
Right now, if available (e.g. on Linux) we have support for this, but it's disabled (set to 0) by default. Are there any reasons why we shouldn't make this enabled by default? I looked at various HTTPD versions, HTTPD v2.3.x sets the timeout to "30s", which on linux > 2.6.31 becomes 45s, and on

Re: Documentation Proposal

2010-11-29 Thread Igor Galić
Sending to the list, because I missed the Reply-To-All button ;) - "Igor Galić" wrote: > - "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > > > On 11/22/2010 10:36 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > I'd like to summarize the consensus we believe to have had on the > > > Documentation agenda points, and put them up