[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Paul closed TS-36.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0a
Assignee: George Paul
This is covered by TS-6
-George
> Build:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom resolved TS-52.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks George!
> traffic_cop does not start
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Paul updated TS-91:
--
Component/s: (was: Console)
WebUI
> Traffic Manager starts up with WebUI disabled
> ---
Traffic Manager starts up with WebUI disabled
-
Key: TS-91
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-91
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Console
Affects Version
Filter generator failing
Key: TS-90
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-90
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Config
Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
At startup, we g
NNTP remnants
-
Key: TS-89
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-89
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0a
Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
Priority: Minor
There are st
traffic_server not able to setrlimit > 1024 on FDs
--
Key: TS-88
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-88
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-18?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsunayoshi Egawa updated TS-18:
---
Attachment: trafficserver_ipv6.patch
- Fuctions:
1. receive a request based on v4 and v6
- back pos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom resolved TS-6.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed, thanks George.
> traffic_manager does not start
> --
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Paul updated TS-6:
-
Attachment: TS-6_traffic_manager_patch4.diff
Last patch was prepared a little to quickly :-(
This updated patch replac
Hello,
I am trying to parse cookies via INK_HTTP_READ_REQUEST_HDR_HOOK.
Upon callback, I can read field name (Cookie) via INKMimeHdrFieldNameGet but
INKMimeHdrFieldValueStringGet for that field index returns NULL for char* and
zero for size.
Are there other ways to parse cookies as plug-in?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790878#action_12790878
]
Manjesh Nilange commented on TS-80:
---
I feel the ideal place for documentation would be in the
Performance improvement: Avoid linear search in remap code
--
Key: TS-87
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-87
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Improvement
Compo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790869#action_12790869
]
Manjesh Nilange commented on TS-80:
---
Leif, you are right. The pcre.h check result is not being
I suppose the question is whether the remap+Y! changes are merged
immediately into the
the branch (cutting 2.0) or lazily (wait for 2.0). As long as the
changes are relatively isolated
the lazy option is easier, or if they come as a package rather than
trickle in.
Do you know how much of the Y!
On 12/15/2009 09:48 AM, John Plevyak wrote:
Why not cut the 2.0 branch now?
We're still waiting to land changes that were made in the Y! internal
tree after we moved the source to ASF. We need those into the 2.0
branch, I'm pretty sure. We're also still discussing the changes for the
"r
HTTP cache miss latency huge
Key: TS-86
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-86
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core
Reporter: John Plevyak
Single clie
Why not cut the 2.0 branch now?
The existing codebase has some serious issues in the event scheduling system
(for example large cache miss latencies, an issue I am submitting)
along with performance problems handling medium size objects (more than
100k)
in addition to the limits handing large ob
Sorry I'm late to this vote since I've been reviewing and testing out this
patch. Preliminary testing indicates good stability with marked improvement in
performance.
+1 to commit and have in 2.0 release provided the cache has proper regression
tests. The code base sorely needs to be updated fo
On 12/09/2009 05:15 PM, John Plevyak wrote:
I would like to ask for a vote on whether or not to commit the cache
partition size patch (+1, -1, 0).
I think we're gonna have to "call" this vote, and with only 2 +1 and one
-1, we need to postpone this checkin until the 2.0 "branch" is cut (and
20 matches
Mail list logo