Build failed in Jenkins: Tika-trunk #901

2012-07-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 481 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ tika-parsers --- [INFO] Compiling 75 source files to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Alex Ott
downloaded sources, compiled, tests passed, tested on several files, works ok. OS: Debian Testing, JVM Sun 1.7.0.05 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Folks, > > A candidate for the Tika 1.2 release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Alex Ott
looks ok for me, +1 On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Alex Ott wrote: > downloaded sources, compiled, tests passed, tested on several files, > works ok. OS: Debian Testing, JVM Sun 1.7.0.05 > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> A candidate for

Tika build error using Maven

2012-07-11 Thread 122jxgcn
Hi, I'm trying to build Apache Tika from the source, but when I run mvn -e clean install on the base directory, I get the following compile error message error: error reading /home/park/.m2/repository/org/apache/poi/poi/3.8-beta5/poi-3.8-beta5.jar; error in opening zip file [INFO] Prepari

Re: Tika build error using Maven

2012-07-11 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, 122jxgcn wrote: I'm trying to build Apache Tika from the source, but when I run mvn -e clean install on the base directory, I get the following compile error message error: error reading /home/park/.m2/repository/org/apache/poi/poi/3.8-beta5/poi-3.8-beta5.jar; error in openi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed. Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory? Also, we used to name it apache-tika-1.1.src.* but now we dropped the apache- prefix? Is that intentional? (tika-app jar ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Zabrane Mickael
All tests succeeded on : Linux Fedora 17 OSX 10.7.4 +1 Regards, Zabrane On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked > good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed. > > Why are there original-tika-app* files in t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Zabrane Mickael
All tests succeeded on : Linux Fedora 17 OSX 10.7.4 +1 Regards, Zabrane On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked > good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed. > > Why are there original-tika-app* files in t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Thanks Mike! On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > I smoke tested, extracting text for the Lucene in Action PDF (looked > good), and verified TIKA-948 is fixed. > > Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory? Good question: this is the first time I've

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Joerg Ehrlich
+1 --- Jörg Ehrlich | Computer Scientist | XMP Technology | Adobe Systems | joerg.ehrl...@adobe.com | work: +49(40)306360 -Original Message- From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012 22:30 To: dev@tika.apache.org Cc: u...@tika.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi Chris, On 10 July 2012 21:29, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 8146c1161d35e6b1dc670d078a773f96c37eef8c. > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.2. > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.2. [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.2 BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: >> Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory? > > Good question: this is the first time I've seen them in there too. I think they're coming from the shad

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.2 release rc #1

2012-07-11 Thread Oleg Tikhonov
Hi, here is my +1. Kind regards, Oleg On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> Why are there original-tika-app* files in the RC directory?