Just so it's clear are we going to:
1) Rename the 2.0 branch over to master
or
2) Re-apply the changes on master.
I recall Chris' preference was 1 which would be quicker. However there
is very likely missed patches. 2 will be more time consuming but it
would be more likely to include all the
+1000
On 9/11/17, 12:03 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote:
Y, well, I didn't say _which_ September...
Given my limited availability to work on this in Sept and POI's decision to
move to Java 1.8, I propose releasing Tika 1.17 after the release of POI 3.17
and PDFBox 2.0.8. This w
Amazing work, thank you Sergey!!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion La
Y, well, I didn't say _which_ September...
Given my limited availability to work on this in Sept and POI's decision to
move to Java 1.8, I propose releasing Tika 1.17 after the release of POI 3.17
and PDFBox 2.0.8. This would be the last version of Tika at the Java 1.7
level, and then we bump
Hi Tim
Thanks, the code, especially the one dealing with adapting the Tika
events to the Bean pipeline will most likely need to be improved :-),
I've tried to make sure it all can be configured as much as possible
(point to the loc of the TikaConfig if needed, etc), but it's only a
start...
I
What great news! Thank you, Sergey!!!
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 9:18 AM
To: Allison, Timothy B. ; dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Integrating Tika with Apache Beam
Hi Tim, All
It took it some time, but fina
Hi Tim, All
It took it some time, but finally Beam TikaIO component is in its
2.2.0-SNAPSHOT master,
https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/java/io/tika
I've created a basic project which can help with running it quickly:
https://github.com/sberyozkin/beamTikaExample
One can just b
