> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
>> Arch sucks.
>>
>> /troll
>
> s/oll/uth/
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
Your opinions are destructive.
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:57 AM, wrote:
>> Your opinions are destructive.
>
> that sentence is in the same class as "colorless green ideas sleep
> furiously"
>
>
> ...but it doesn't change the fact that Arch sucks.
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
mediocre mental capacity and understanding the Englis
> People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway.
I'm curious, how did you come to this conclusion?
> Can we please add to the patch a feature that rm -rf /'s the disk of
> anyone who runs it?
How is this a good idea?
> It is for purely *stupidity* reasons.
What are you basing this on? Can you back up your statement?
> Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
> required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
> harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
> portable by raising the hardware requirements. The only gain is
> (arguably) aesthetic. Thi
> I build large-scale compute clusters. I build massive storage networks.
I am
> familiar with the sorts of things people are doing with large amounts
> of processing power.
"I am an intergalactic species from the planet .
Your super-clusters and storage clusters pale in comparison to my "
See
