Hello all,
I'm just forwarding a bug reported on surf Debian package [1]. This
bug makes package unfit for Wheezy release.
(I'm not the maintainer of package only did a recent QA upload.)
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659296
Best Regards
--
Vasudev K
erities
@Peter thanks for providing the patch quickly
Thanks folks.
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://blog.copyninja.info
http://identi.ca/vasudev
copyni...@frndk.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11:46 Fri 10 Feb , Peter Hartman wrote:
> Fixed.
Hello Peter thanks for the patch. Can the permission for cookies.txt
can be changed to 0600 instead of 0644?.
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://blog.copyninja.info
http://identi.ca/vasudev
vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Osta
arded message from Florian Weimer -
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:18:36 +0100
From: Florian Weimer
To: Vasudev Kamath
Subject: Re: Accepted surf 0.4.1-6 (source i386)
* Vasudev Kamath:
> surf (0.4.1-6) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* QA upload.
>* debian/patches:
>
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 11 February 2012 04:13, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> For your information. I applied your patch and it was uploaded to
>> Debian. But I got this mail after it is accepted to Debian. If you can
>> provide me a patch w
On 09:52 Mon 12 Nov , Carlos Torres wrote:
> Could you provide more information, like dwm version, font, and bank
> account?
dwm version is 6.0,
font is -*-lucidabright-medium-r-*-*-*-100-*-*-*-*-*-*
bank account??
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: cop