Re: [dev] c++ compiler that rocks

2015-11-30 Thread Timothy Rice
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead > of line wrapping client-side? I think someone has just volunteered to submit an RFC on how to send electronic mail between computers with a multitude of different architectures and screen sizes on the internet in the 21st century. Because,

[dev] Languages that suck (was "Note On Webkit Versions")

2016-05-01 Thread Timothy Rice
> C is definitely not suckless either, especially when it comes > to UB, but it's probably the language with least suck and > highest simplicity while giving the most power to the developer. Not too long ago I expressed support for C as a way to obtain very fast programs; the context is I work aro

Re: [dev] Languages that suck (was "Note On Webkit Versions")

2016-05-02 Thread Timothy Rice
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:36:56AM +0200, hiro wrote: > the popularity of a language amongst hipsters is quite irrelevant. C > is still the most used language in programs that actually do anything > (i.e. not some "app" written in a markup language). Lol, nice :) However, arguing to tradition and

Re: [dev] Languages that suck (was "Note On Webkit Versions")

2016-05-02 Thread Timothy Rice
Thanks FRIGN, both your emails have given me a bit to think about. ~ Tim

Re: [dev] running dwm from/with gnome

2016-05-16 Thread Timothy Rice
Dear all, There seems to be some confusion around xsessions etc, resulting in some factual errors in one or two recent emails. The following might be useful: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47359/what-is-xsession-for To summarise, .xsession is used as a custom script when starting X from

Re: [dev] running dwm from/with gnome

2016-05-16 Thread Timothy Rice
> I'm not sure my other "factual error(s?)" was, but I would be happy to > be enlightened. Yeah, I wrote in a hurry. After sending it I thought it could have been worded better. The issues I noticed and was responding to were: 1. Uncertainty around whether .xinitrc would be recognised on session

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
Hi Pat, > Sure that it needs a bit of improvements... 1. I am not sure what problem JWM is trying to solve. 2. I do not think "improvements" will make it suck less. Certainly there is a place in the world for JWM, just as there is a place in the world for Openbox, Awesome, even Gnome and KDE. I

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
> jwm needs to be simplified and optimized first. Giving a new birth name > ??WM... Well, make it happen. Show, don't tell. ~ Tim

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
Hi Pat, > http://incise.org/not-so-tiny-window-managers.html On that list I see evilwm. Apparently it is stacking, and if I'm not mistaken it appears to have a similar size to dwm (maybe even smaller). So why propose JWM instead of EvilWM? ~ Tim

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:31:53PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote: > I just compile without xinerama, and dwm is slighty lighter than jwm. > If you stick to the minimum with jwm, it is not that heavy at all. This is > nice. > > Why jwm, because after chopping some lines into code, it can

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:30:17AM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote: > MIght you have a well-balanced discussion, not over-too-serious or the > other side? simply just in the middle, balanced. A nice sentiment, but indeed for it to be a discussion it should be two-sided. At the moment you

Re: [dev] JWM on website

2016-08-02 Thread Timothy Rice
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:48:05AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote: > I'd say cwm instead of evilwm. When I had to use an ant screen laptop, it was > pretty nice. The only thing I lacked is workspaces. Ah, someone who knows how to have a discussion, how lovely! :D ~ Tim

Re: [dev] Sane office alternative?

2016-08-25 Thread Timothy Rice
> what do you use to communicate with the part of the world (a majority, > unfortunately) who uses suckish formats such as .doc(x), .od[tspg] or > whatever? If Office is bloated, LibreOffice ain't slim, and people > keep sending me word documents :/ When people send me word documents, I have my ma

Re: [dev] Writing subtitles for videos

2017-08-31 Thread Timothy Rice
> Like trolling on mailing lists, thank you. Unlike the OP's four paragraph feature request against software which suckless obviously doesn't offer, I have at least found isabella's content entertaining and concise. While I'm sure it was kind of you to step in to defend your bro, I would have pre

Re: [dev] Writing subtitles for videos

2017-08-31 Thread Timothy Rice
> We are really glad to know you've been entertained. I think you mean "I am really glad". > this would have been more constructive to address directly Thomas to ask > about his needs if you're interested at all in this discussion. It sounds like you want to have a discussion about how to do th

Re: [dev] Writing subtitles for videos

2017-09-03 Thread Timothy Rice
> Holy shit. Is everyone on here a fucking child trying to score points about > something that really doesn't matter? People like you are the reason why > Usenet died. > > Grow up. > > If you want to know how to deal with something like an adult: He said, resurrecting shit that had already fizzl