/sh, but I did it now
So you didn't test this script?
Are you sure it's actually executable?
--
Storkman
hing forever... until you restart X, or change the property
again.
That being said, I've had wmname LG3D in my .xinitrc for years now, and it's
never interfered with anything as far as I can tell.
As for what "LG3D" is, apparently it used to be some wacky Java 3D window
manager back in the magical times when that sounded like a good idea.
--
Storkman
T supported by ANY font",
you could just iterate over all fonts and OR their charsets together.
$ time fc-list '' fullname charset >/dev/null
0m00.06s real 0m00.05s user 0m00.01s system
> If it is possible and someone can point out which routines I should be
> looking at then I can try to take a crack at it. In case that's not
> possible, then there's probably not a whole lot that can be done about
> the situation.
>
> - NRK
>
- Storkman
On January 16, 2023 11:21:57 AM UTC, A Farzat wrote:
>Btw, on the email subject it says [SPAM Warning!]. Is it anything I need
>to be concerned with?
Spam filters hate the .xyz TLD because it's supposedly "frequently used by
spammers". I don't know why single out that one in particular, but i
On January 17, 2023 3:03:52 AM UTC, Anskrevy
wrote:
>I've got XF86XK_AudioPlay bound in my config.h with the necessary
>include file, and this hotkey works when I use my keyboard. However,
>when sent from a pair of bluetooth headphones the hotkey isn't
>triggered. I've got the following xev ou
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 04:28:15PM +0200, p...@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I bind keyboard shortcut to launch dmenu_extended[1] in dwm, what works
> flawlessly before the `Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD
> handling` [1] commit, since dmenu_extended does not change anything her
t choice is 0-clause BSD, which beats MIT by about 60 words.
> Also, the GPL is included on the on the cat-v.org list of harmful software but
> without explanation. Does anyone here know if its considered harmful for
> compatability reasons or something else?
>
> Anyway, thanks for the programs.
>
> Cheers
> Ray
>
--
Storkman
ly checking for atk and dbus even though
the application wasn't using them directly in any way...
--
Storkman
like "bool is_cromulent(foo)", I'd expect it to return
true when foo IS cromulent (or 1 if the return type is int).
Are you saying it should return cromulence_t with values either
IS_CROMULENT or IS_NOT_CROMULENT?
> > [...] Not so long ago, this very list opined that C89 is the only true
> > C standard [...]
If there was a new poll, I demand a recount!
--
Storkman
ms.
> * * *
>
> Safety is overrated. The more "safe" a language is, the less it can do.
> The more the programmer is "protected" from "shooting himself in the
> foot", the less control he has over the program. The most powerful
> language is assembler/machine code, and C is very close.
>
--
Storkman
> Current serial number in output stream: 394
>
> Probably because tinyx doesn't implement an X11 extension that st needs.
Have you tried the current git master of st? The way it handles color maps
has significantly changed in literally the last commit (August 8), making
it a lot more tolerant of funny display hardware.
--
Storkman
ust introduced an entirely new bug, since the mainline st never needed
a 32-bit color mode.
I've made an updated version, if you'd like to check it out.
--
Storkman
>From 13235fb1bac7d0bd24186e391d7befa4a569e4f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Storkman
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:1
> @@ -861,8 +861,6 @@ c_common_post_options (const char **pfilename)
>reject certain GNU extensions also present the defaults for later
>language modes. */
> if (!c_dialect_cxx ()
> - && !flag_isoc99
> - && !global_dc->m_pedantic_errors
> && !OPTION_SET_P (flag_permissive))
> {
> flag_permissive = 1;
>
--
Storkman
> Instead of killing the X server along with dwm, the X server freezes and
> I have to telnet in
> from another device to kill it, by running pkill Xfbdev.
>
> Does anyone know how to improve the above script to get it to kill X
> after I kill dwm?
Well, that's what xinit is for, isn't it?
--
Storkman
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 06:33:42AM +, stefan1 wrote:
> On 2024-11-13 00:02, Storkman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:07:45PM +, stefan1 wrote:
> >> Not really related to what was discussed earlier,
> >> but I thought I might find someone who
practical enough to use on its own.
https://git.storkman.nl/xcamcontrol
--
Storkman
16 matches
Mail list logo
