On 24/11/04 12:06AM, Jeremy wrote:
> I like this
> if [ "$butt" -eq 1 ]; then
>
My terrible humor LOL.
On second thought, I think that's awful in terms of readability so I've
just renamed it "button".
> I did my bar a similar way, except each widget is a script responsible for
> its own formatt
On 24/10/25 12:55PM, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:11:28AM +0000, Raymond Cole wrote:
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > I made a new window manager and an accompanying status program:
> >
> > https://wolog.xyz/repos/swm
> > https://wolog
On 24/10/27 09:17AM, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Дана 24/10/27 03:07AM, Raymond Cole написа:
> > It seems like you get the impression that I want suckless to host my
> > projects? I never requested that.
>
> Apologies, you are correct. The subject of the thread might be
>
On 24/10/27 10:50AM, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Дана 24/10/27 09:21AM, Raymond Cole написа:
> > common among you
>
> Among who? As stated, I am just a user and enthusiast of suckless
> software.
>
I was talking to suckless developers there. Sorry.
> > the overall unwel
On 24/10/26 12:56PM, Chris Down wrote:
> Restore the Git history, or violate the license: it's as simple as that.
>
Prove it.
On 24/10/25 05:03PM, Chris Down wrote:
> Raymond Cole writes:
> > My bad. I thought of that notice as transitional so didn't treat it
> > very rigorously. I've updated swm to meet the requirement.
> >
> > I realize that the previous deal of including th
On 24/10/25 08:24PM, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> This has already been discussed:
>
> https://lists.suckless.org/dev/2306/35253.html
>
> and
>
> https://lists.suckless.org/dev/2306/35258.html
>
> In other words, when you license a work under GPL, you license **the
> whole work** under GPL. You can
On 24/10/26 09:15PM, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> The main question that I, as a user, have is: what does a program do,
> what is its main function? If it overlaps with some other program, the
> second thing I am asking is: what does it do better? And, having in
> mind the suckless philosophy, the fo
granted, provided that this notice is retained.
So, dwm developers, how do you like it? Do I need to get permissions
from all of you listed in dwm's LICENSE file, or maybe someone can act
as a representative?
Looking forward to your responses.
Kind regards,
Raymond Cole
On 24/11/05 10:55AM, Jeremy wrote:
> > I had a look at your bar program. So it has background scripts that
> > output to files independently and depends on inotify to wait for updates.
> > One of my first ideas of infobar is the same in essence, but with
> > scripts writing to FIFOs instead of fil
10 matches
Mail list logo
