[dev] Build system: redo

could probably be added to the list as well... I especially like his take on the FS hierarchy: http://cr.yp.to/slashpackage.html -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Build system: redo

To all the people complaining about python: there is a minimal version which is ~250 lines of sh. You loose a few things like incremental builds but the core build system is still available. -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: [dev] Build system: redo

rking on a fix for that. -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Build system: redo

See my earlier reply concerning the minimal branch. -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Build system: redo

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: > Mk shares no code from make. > [snip] So? -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

Have you thought of using something like NIX? The implementation sucks but the idea there: completely reproducible builds is incredible. -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

Also, may I recommend s6 as the init system? It follows the suckless philosophy: mionimal, does exactly what is needed and is stable. http://www.skarnet.org/software/s6/why.html -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] Re: Why HTTP is so bad?

Anybody take a look at the /browser idea? Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/ -- PG.