On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
> Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
Fortran is nowadays seldom used, few people can tell if it "sucks in the
sense of suckless" (?).
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> FWIW, my understanding is that the LAPACK library must have an API
> which conforms with a reference Fortran implementation, but there are
> various versions implemented in various languages (Fortran, C, CUDA,
> etc).
This is true. But
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:57:24PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> I was pointing out more how the simple-minded software metrics would
> condemn you to around about the level of performance acheived by the
> reference LAPACK (white bars) in the paper referenced, which to my
> mind suggests there's a f
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:56:07PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> I think it's just a difference in when we'd use words like terrible.
Well, being on a suckless list, I tend to agree with suckless' definitions
of "terrible".
Perhaps all this could be elaborated from a different angle. Most of the
pe
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Bartosz Nitkiewicz wrote:
> I'm looking for a best way to monitor battery status in dwm. Any hints?
xbattbar,
http://iplab.naist.jp/member/suguru/xbattbar.html
But no idea whether it is suckless (i.e. haven't looked beyond the surface,
which I like).
-
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:50:53PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Both are crap. openrc in particular is some serious amateur-hour
I love it when suckless talks about amateur hours.
Maybe it is time to rewrite cat again?
- Jukka
