I will take a look at it as soon as posible :)
thanks
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:33:53PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
> > also im looking forward to th
I like this one too :)
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:25:10AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 22:15, Uriel wrote:
> > Here is an idea the Google folks might like: Port sta.li (and p9p?) to
> > use Android's libc. AFAIK there is no real linux distro that uses the
> > Android libc, and th
I know it sounds silly but i would like to know that too, i tried the
middle click script and didnt work (yes i tried the one that was
supposed to be over a uzbl wiki)
Eze
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:28:47PM -0400, anonymous wrote:
> I have tried to put code from http://surf.suckless.org/fi
belive is the method used by uzbl.
Eze
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Brandon Ros wrote:
> I hope this idea will not be immediately rejected because it may
> remove simplicity.
>
> Just how the URL is set by xprop, after pressing a keyboard shortcut
> then typing some se
Awesome i will give it a go.
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 05:51:52AM +0200, Nibble wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a little (68 LOC) "web-framework" is sh. I think that the
> most remarkable features are:
> * Markdown support
> * Only depends on some standard commands: 'echo', 'grep', 'ls' and
> 'sed'.
-download.sh
Eze
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:48:41AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2010-04-07 18:22] Bjartur Thorlacius
> >
> > The problem is that surf is both a HTTP-client (a downloader) and a
> > HTML-renderer. When you only want to download HTML-files from
> >
As you said, it is the first hit and it points to suckless.org
i could not care less about what an article on wikipedia says about
dwm, if a potential user reads the article, as long as the reference link
points to suckless.org its cool with me.
"...and nothing of value was lost"
On Wed, Feb 24,
I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
have caugth my attention.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 02:46 PM, Peter John Hartman wrote:
> > I agree
