On 02/09/10 23:54, Alexander Surma wrote:
> Well, the connection is definitely encrypted. Regardless of a man in
> the middle or not ;)
> However - I see your point.
> My suggestion would be, that we allow yet another userscript to handle
> this. I for one do not care for verifying certificates. Bu
On 02/14/10 09:08, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> So what is your point? Everything has to be written in C? This is
>> mindbogglingly stupid. Not only is C; high maintenance, slow
>> development cycle, insecure but also extremely low level.
