keys to control alsa, launch
xterm, and launch my mail program.
Maybe you will all find it useful, since I found the code from dwm very useful,
Calvin Morrison
and I forgot the link... which is located here.
http://github.com/mutantturkey/hotkey
On 8 February 2014 18:37, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Comrades -
>
> I have had a love affair with dwm's config.h. Unfortunately I also
> love i3, and also deal with a plethora of other desk
On 9 February 2014 01:07, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-02-08 18:37:19 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I have had a love affair with dwm's config.h. Unfortunately I also
>> love i3, and also deal with a plethora of other desktops on my day to
>> day work. so I created ho
On 9 February 2014 01:36, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-02-09 01:22:00 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> > - You are using system(), which is highly unportable and extremely
>> > fragile;
>>
>> I'm not so sure. What's a better solution? system() seems li
This is great! I was just having a discussion about someone for a
non-x11 keyboard binding system!
Thanks for the link
Calvin Morrison
On 9 February 2014 05:32, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> Although taking a different approach (conf file parsed at start-up,
> additional features), the sxhk
tle I am struck at implementing it
> myself, as the whole X11/event system seems to be designed to make my
> brain rot. :)
>
> Well, your nice addition to the suckless tools has all in all made my
> day, so thx again!
>
> cheers, mih
>
> On 2/9/14, Calvin Morrison wr
ALT+P spawns dmenu
dmenu shows
1. mocp -g
2. xterm
3. firefox
you press 3 and enter and it executes..?
what do you think of that?
On 10 February 2014 18:24, Michael Hauser wrote:
> Calvin Morrison writes:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "modal bindings". Do you mean li
On 10 February 2014 18:31, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> make a hidden window, and set the window focus to it? that'd be my
> guess. I don't think you can grab two non modifier keys though, < and
>> for example probably wouldn't work with the way I am grabbing it.
>
I added hotkey config file support. It is so ugly, and requires much
more code. I am ashamed of it to be honest, but it works.
except when it segfaults if your config isn't written pefectly. i'm
working on that.
On 11 February 2014 06:07, Kurt Van Dijck
wrote:
>> Although taking a different ap
I'm not sure why tabbed exist when it's a window management feature.
for example i3, a tiling window manager supports tabs as part of it's
stacking methods. (see attachment)
What's the rational reason for it to exist, other than dwm needs to
stay under x amount of lines of code?
Just wondering,
if you view "tabbing" almost like a dwm layout, it's insane to not
implement it into a window manager. Should all other layouts be in a
subwindow that xembeds?
On 17 February 2014 12:25, koneu wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 06:21 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
>> What&#
> If you think of tabs as overlapping windows, the concept seems to
> actually conflict with one of the main advantage of tiling WMs, i. e. to
> make efficient use of your screen estate by showing all open windows at
> all times.
I seriously doubt that is the main advantage. The main advantage is
> Nevertheless, I am sure there are use-cases for tabbed I'm not aware of
> yet.
> One thing is clear though: It's not dwm's task to supply tabbing.
That is what is clearly not clear. In a group so focused on clarity
and logic, I am amazed by the inability to give a concise answer other
than "it's
hiro,
fall off a cliff.
sincerely, your good friend, best wishes,
Calvin
ate programs.
I do think that managing windows is part of the window manager, as
multiple st instances are each a window, it seems best to tab them
with the window manager.
On 17 February 2014 11:48, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:29:06 -0500
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
>>
Hi,
I've just written lock, a simple little script to ensure that two
programs won't run at once. I am using this to ensure my users don't
overwrite the same shared folder in a set of genomic analysis scripts.
I thought it might be useful.
The script will either create the lock and exit, or ping
On 8 April 2014 12:19, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> Hi Calvin,
>
> Thanks for sharing it, it's really neat!
>
> I have the same problem with some cron jobs, but I use lockrun[1].
>
> It's source code is quite simple[2] too.
That code is simple enough, but it did leave a poor taste in my mouth.
A clean
> first off, I'd definitely rewrite this locking-script in C, given it
> doesn't use Shell-features excessively.
> I see no reason to keep it as a Shell-script.
What is the benefit of using a C program? For me it would be easier to
implement sane flags, but I am lazy. bash makes it easy to prototy
On 9 April 2014 09:10, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:47:14 -0400
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
>> What is the benefit of using a C program? For me it would be easier to
>> implement sane flags, but I am lazy. bash makes it easy to prototype
>> and run with a very
I added a lock gif. Check it out.
https://github.com/mutantturkey/lock/blob/master/README.markdown
that should clarify
On 9 April 2014 09:12, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 9 April 2014 09:10, FRIGN wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:47:14 -0400
>> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
&g
I pushed the rewritten version
http://github.com/mutantturkey/lock
On 10 April 2014 07:02, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:46:08 +0200
> hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If one day you discover this script to be some bottleneck in your
>> webscale world-changing app then you can still t
but i dont care abotu other people because i am selfish and lazy. why
don't you get a client that supports top posting??? bottom posting is
not suckless! /s
On 10 April 2014 11:48, koneu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Don't top post.
>
> Bee
I suggest a simple solution, once and for all. simply stop reading
email all together
-> get a life, get up and go out, stop bitching about some random
internet people not posting in your preferred format, get laid, get a
job, relax, chill <-
On 10 April 2014 13:13, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.n
I think if you are having trouble reading you should put on some glasses
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
On 10 April 2014 13:23, koneu wrote:
> On April 10, 2014 7:20:56 PM CEST, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>>I suggest a simple solution, once and for all. simply stop reading
>&
On 10 April 2014 14:21, Charlie Kester wrote:
> (Oh joy, another thread about posting etiquette!)
> On Thu 10 Apr 2014 at 10:13:49 PDT Louis Santillan wrote:
>>
>> When someone invents a monitor that supports displaying content that
>> is below the fold, first, I'll stop top posting.
>
>
> Display
1 April 2014 09:52, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 07:39, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I think you're
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014 4:33 AM, "Truls Becken" wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-04-08, at 17:48, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>>
>
On 11 April 2014 07:39, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I think you're
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2014 4:33 AM, "Truls Becken" wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-04-08, at 17:48, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
>> > The script will either create the lock and exit, or ping the l
That's okay, I think it's kind of insane too. good ol' dos2unix fixed it fine.
On 11 April 2014 10:10, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, next time mar77i, check your damned line endings. This I
>>
new program, new tools, new thread.
I'd like lock to belong somewhere. FRIGN and I privately discussed
submitting it to moreutils, a package which contains unix utilities
which didn't quite make it into coreutils, but are still useful.
He says:
> Frankly, I don't like the idea. Moreutils is lic
On 11 April 2014 18:25, sin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:02:55 +0200 Calvin Morrison
>> wrote:
>> > I'd like lock to belong somewhere. FRIGN and I privately dis
when are you planning a release?
On 16 April 2014 06:15, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:42:12PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> On 11 April 2014 18:25, sin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> >
I'll have it done by then
On 17 April 2014 11:24, sin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:21:45AM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> when are you planning a release?
>
> 1st of May or so
>
Hi,
Honestly assuming that the POSIX shell is anything other than
horseshit, full of weird rules, plenty of non-standard-shells
surrounding it, poor variable handling, barely working functions, a
lack of decent scoping, and more crap like that, why are we even
looking at implmeneting a posix shell
>>
>> Honestly assuming that the POSIX shell is anything other than
>> horseshit, full of weird rules, plenty of non-standard-shells
>> surrounding it, poor variable handling, barely working functions, a
>> lack of decent scoping, and more crap like that, why are we even
>> looking at implmeneting
> How are you getting on with this? I am planning to do a bit more polishing
> to ubase + add 1-2 tools and then make an initial v0.1 release. Would
wouldn't this fit better in sbase?
On 22 April 2014 17:24, sin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:20:29PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> > How are you getting on with this? I am planning to do a bit more polishing
>> > to ubase + add 1-2 tools and then make an initial v0.1 release. Would
>>
>
> Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
see [0]
[0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
On 25 June 2014 12:49, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
>
> see [0]
>
> [0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
But more seriously, GNU freedom is the same kind of 'freedom' that is
promised
>> If you craft your words enough, and trick people enough, then they
>> will believe it is free, while being coerced into helping the 'greater
>> good'
>
> The 'greater good' isn't a good but a bad thing in your opinion?
It's a great thing in my opinion, but coercion isn't really a good way
to ac
> Granted, GPL did a lot of good, it created a free software culture and
> made Linux what it is. Ubuntu has also done a lot of good by getting
> people started in Linux, but that doesn't make it suckless.
You have cause and effect written incorrectly. Free software existed
first, then licenses we
On 25 June 2014 14:28, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> This is a reboot of the previous thread that was hi-jacked by a
> derived topic ;)
>
> Let's stay focused on the pertinent topic of
> the thread, without the damage of what we wrongly did on the
> thread related to the suckless distro,
>
> thank yo
> Could you repost on the thread I was rightfully requested to
> create for this topic.
STOP. PLEASE. get decent mail software that can handle subthreads and
it's not an issue.
On 7 July 2014 16:25, Lee Fallat wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Does anyone know of a graphics library that supports a text and menu
> widget, simple layout system and is easily portable to any OS? I was
> thinking of maybe just creating something like this myself because
> it's so specific, but I'd like to se
On 9 July 2014 20:56, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
>>> If "suckless-vi" ends up based on sandy I'll be as happy as a clam. I
>>> don't have a lot of free time, but I'd be happy to help.
>>
>>I'm actually also interested in a "suckless-vi" but for me this
>>includes
>>a design based on piece tables rathe
LDAP sucks, is there any good alternative for managing user logins
over 5-10 servers?
Calvin
I like that, but then I guess I need to propogate all changes for my
users, like passwords and such?
On 23 July 2014 15:25, Andrew Hills wrote:
> On 7/23/14, 3:21 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> LDAP sucks, is there any good alternative for managing user logins
>> over 5-10 servers
On 23 July 2014 15:37, Markus Teich wrote:
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I like that, but then I guess I need to propogate all changes for my
>> users, like passwords and such?
>
> Heyho,
>
> I think passwd entries should suffice. The admin should not be responsible
&g
On 23 July 2014 16:06, Alexander Tanyukevich wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>>
>> LDAP sucks, is there any good alternative for managing user logins
>> over 5-10 servers?
>
> What is wrong with LDAP from your point of view ?
>
What happened to running Dis on a Javascript platform or running drawterm
on HTML5/JS?
Right now if you started to program sane applications in A sane langauge,
making display and use easy, then just have it run over draw, why wouldn't
that achieve what you guys want?
On 31 October 2014 15:
Well there are certainly two types of websites,
Applications, IE open for hours, has many pages that are linked
together, like Facebook, Gmail, etc
then there is more of the 'content' sites, where each page stands on
it's own just fine, like a news website.
For portability, use what you've got.
hi,
I just released fsbm [0] a small bandwidth monitor
i rewrote cbm, a bandwidth meter to output to stdout instead of
writing out to curses. I find this to be more more palatable and I can
use it with i3 or whatever status bar system I want. the code still
sucks, but i only just hacked out the c
53:28PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I just released fsbm [0] a small bandwidth monitor
>>
>> i rewrote cbm, a bandwidth meter to output to stdout instead of
>> writing out to curses. I find this to be more more palatable and I can
>> use it
On 31 October 2014 17:23, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Exactly,
>
> a C rewrite will be done, I just didn't have any more time. (time to
> go trick or treating!) [0]
>
> It reeks of stupid OOP when it doesn't need it at all
>
> Calvin
>
> [0] http://imgur.
On 6 November 2014 10:28, Bobby Powers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>> - Don't use C++ style comments (//).
>
> I personally find C++ style comments more pleasant on the eyes for
> single-line comments, and they are part of the C99 spec.
>
> Can someone explain why they think /* */ s
many of these issues have been fixed. some I did not fix, yet, some
will not be fixed. Thank you for your input, may someone find this
useful
On 6 November 2014 12:05, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Some more feedback:
>
> * Use a more sensible formatting style (look at the suckless.org
> projects
is that different or the same as the kickstarter assassination award?
On 7 November 2014 13:07, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:37:04 +0100
> koneu wrote:
>
>> You disgust me.
>
> You are an official nominee for the 2014 suckless award.
> Stay tuned!
>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>
> --
> FRIGN
>
On 7 November 2014 13:12, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:08:47 -0500
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
>> is that different or the same as the kickstarter assassination award?
>
> How did you know we have a hitlist? :O
>
I am in the inner sanctum
folks,
I can't grep this program. I do not know why... Any ideas?
On 7 November 2014 05:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > * Use strtonum() or estrtol() from sbase instead of atoi().
>> >>
>> >> I agree here if the string
If I fflush it, it works, but that seems hacky
On 7 November 2014 13:28, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> folks,
>
> I can't grep this program. I do not know why... Any ideas?
>
> On 7 November 2014 05:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0
> Default example:
>
>printf("%s | %s | %s | %s", load, fs_usage, batt, time);
>
> Customized version:
>
>printf("%s | %s | %s", fs_usage, load, batt);
I don't see the point of doing anything but this. Having this as a
link in config.h could work no?
#define OUTPUT printf("%s", load);
th
I am drunk, and you guys are self righteous assholes. Also I love this
list more than any other.
long live suckless,
Calvin
On 17 November 2014 06:08, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:19:29PM +0100, hiro wrote:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/fifth-browser/files/
>
> I laughed a lot yesterday!
> It's good new that someone hacked up a lightweighter Opera and plans to
> mantain it up-to-date on the
On 19 November 2014 14:32, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 01:19 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>> I'm curious to know what flavor of *nix people on this list use on a
>> day-to-day basis.
>
for linux, I use debian across the board, it makes it easier for me to
deal with getting my development/use s
On 23 November 2014 at 17:20, Henrique Lengler
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
> I'm asking because I don't find too much on suckless site about it
> I don't have experience in any other compiler.
>
> I also found someday TCC (Tiny C compiler - bellard.org/tcc/)
> A
On 24 November 2014 at 11:42, v4hn wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:20:44PM +, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:35:52PM +, doa379 wrote:
> > There's an incredible amount of spam and OT on this list isn'
On 24 November 2014 at 15:44, koneu wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Markus Wichmann wrote:
>> compiling with -O3 will result in some broken binaries. Somewhere. Why?
>
> Because -O3 is very aggressive and should NOT be used. Especially not
> when compiling/bootstrapping a system. In most cases it makes th
On 24 November 2014 at 15:46, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 24 November 2014 at 15:44, koneu wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> Markus Wichmann wrote:
>>> compiling with -O3 will result in some broken binaries. Somewhere. Why?
>>
>> Because -O3 is very aggress
On 24 November 2014 at 17:10, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Mon 24 Nov 2014 at 12:47:30 PDT Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
>> On 24 November 2014 at 11:42, v4hn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:20:44PM +, Henrique Lengler wrote:
>>> &g
On 24 November 2014 at 18:35, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think most of these threads could be avoided if we make the creation
> of new threads cost money.
I think we can just simplify it even more, why just reuse one thread
for all conversations?
On 25 November 2014 at 14:08, Greg Reagle wrote:
> From http://suckless.org/project_ideas:
>> Write the most useful unix userland commands in the new Go language
>> created by Google to form a robust base for future Unix-like
>> userlands that do not suffer from the vulnerabilities that are
>> com
On 25 November 2014 at 14:22, Jean-Christophe Petkovich
wrote:
> ~ $ rustc hello-world.rs -o hello-world -C prefer-dynamic
using -C lto might also yield smaller binaries
On 14 December 2014 at 11:44, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> On 14/12/2014, Jonny Langley wrote:
>> It adds just under 100 LOC, but means the shell scripts
>> dmenu_{run,path} are unneeded.
>
> ; wc -l dmenu_^(run path)
> 2 dmenu_run
> 13 dmenu_path
> 15 total
how many lines of code is an interprete
check out dillo
On 15 February 2015 at 13:52, Ralph Eastwood wrote:
> On 15 February 2015 at 18:23, Marc Weber wrote:
>> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ could be close.
>> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
>> In any case it looks like to be a lot of effort.
>>
>>
i've tested out dillo yesterday, and a bit today. it is very fast, but
lacks javascript. Overall useful for simpler pages (lwn for example),
but fails badly on things with floating elements instead of tables.
On 16 February 2015 at 02:40, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Marc Weber said:
>> also have
On 15 July 2015 at 14:13, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:13:42 +0200 Ross Mohn wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> > I wanted more mailinglists, but Anselm didn’t like more. There is no
>> > support
>> >
On 6 January 2016 at 15:14, Ben Woolley wrote:
> I know the proposal is "modest", but the timing can be represented in file
> names that are microseconds from start, with an optional dash followed by the
> microsecond to jump to (for looping).
>
> The main issue with this is that all file names
nto u/sbase for me?
Calvin
On 22 April 2014 at 17:53, sin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:34:47PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> On 22 April 2014 17:24, sin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:20:29PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> >> > How are you g
On 12 January 2016 at 10:27, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:35:59AM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> sorry to revive an old topic -
>>
>> I'd like to have this in with other utils, because i find it useful in
>> my day to day work. I do no
> Care to clarify the limitations of flock?
Extensive discussion took place here:
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1404/20719.html
On 12 January 2016 at 11:39, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:28:42AM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> > Care to clarify the limitations of flock?
>>
>> Extensive discussion took place here:
>> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1404/20719.html
>
Hi,
I had time to commit my last changes into fsbm [0], the minimal
bandwidth meter. Notably the two features added are below:
-r flag now accepted to show raw byte or bit counts, rather than
squashing into Kb/s Mb/s etc.
-i flag now accepted to show a single interface that is requested
For now
On 11 February 2016 at 12:53, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> It's not supposed to be used on Linux on the first place - right.
> My bad for missing this information.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 03:48:34PM -0200, Alba Pompeo wrote:
>>> Both ar
On 11 May 2016 at 06:56, Nick wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A few nights ago my too-expensive laptop met with too-cheap wine and now
> it is a far-too-expensive brick. As it's therefore time for me to
> install a new OS on a new laptop, I was wondering what people would
> recommend. I've been using Debia
Quote:
zdivmod Calculates the quotient and the remainder. This is available
because when you calculate the quotient you get the remainder
for free. zdiv and zmod simply call zdivmod with the dummy
variable as one of the output variables.
Why include a wrapper at all? Why not just allow the user t
On 13 June 2016 at 19:03, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:18:39 -0400
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
>> Quote:
>>
>> zdivmod Calculates the quotient and the remainder. This
>> is available because when you calculate the quotient you
>> get the r
On 11 January 2017 at 20:12, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm working a non-graphical video editor. However, I need a
> proper name for the project, and I have no idea what to call
> it, so I'm taking suggestions from you.
>
> A non-graphical video editor may sound a bit insane. There
>
was cleaning out old mail and I found this quote. Almost 5 years ago, huh.
"Changing your mind (in the face of new evidence or understanding!) is
not something to be ashamed of, it is something everyone should be
proud of."
— Uriel
On 10 June 2017 at 19:24, wrote:
>> there are no interesting web browsers or web browser concepts.
>
> hiro just discovered a very interesting radical approach to fixing the
> web: if there were no web browsers, the web would be pointless and thus
> would not need to be fixed.
I have mailed you
> Also HTML/CSS is not code that is executed or interpreted, it's a
> markup language, a description of a document. Plugins are also not
> remote arbitrary code execution, they are local code execution, code
> you have control over.
Last time I checked, CSS is turing complete
>> > For youtube, we agree 100%, but it seems that the javascript/modern web
>> > engine
>> > combo is used as a kind of DRM... namely the dependency by complexity is
>> > _on
>> > purpose_ (see the user agreement of youtube: you MUST use the
>> > javascript/modern
>> > web engine video player.
On 13 June 2017 at 09:29, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> linux supports multiple users for permission management.
A hassle at best, quirky at worst. I'd rather have per process permissions.
> on android nothing works either. apps often require random libraries
> like google play services to be
On 13 June 2017 at 18:30, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I reallize that I deeply lacked tact: that question was highly
>> unapropriate.
>
> You are unappropriate.
>
Does reading this mailing list make anyone want to do anything but
drink heavily to forget?
On 15 June 2017 at 10:13, Dominykas Mostauskis
wrote:
> Here's an idea. As an alternative to wrestling with resource heavy
> applications directly, implement heavy taxation on consumer device
> computational power. That is, tax production and consumption of
> desktop or portable devices based on h
On 16 June 2017 at 11:49, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:53:07 +
>> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sylvain,
>>
>> > openbsd is as shitty as linux and their security thingy is just
>> > bullshit.
>>
>> are you ser
In lieu of the recent 1.1.1.1 announcement, i was wondering if anyone
has written a suckless, simple, dns over http relay? Maybe it would be
a good thing to add to the wiki as potential ideas? The basic concept
of the tool would be to run as a daemon, listen on port 53 to
requests, and then make ht
> On 2 April 2018 at 16:56, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> Given these circumstances, I see no elegant way to implement this in a
> suckless way given HTTP/2 requires the server to do some pretty complex
> connection-state-handling.
curl kinda sucks, but, at least it's outside of our code base (see: surf
ponse, who knows, whatever, it kind of works.
It sucks, but I did something
https://github.com/mutantturkey/sdohd
On 2 April 2018 at 17:07, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> On 2 April 2018 at 16:56, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>> Given these circumstances, I see no elegant way to implement this
On 3 April 2018 at 15:43, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 00:12:01 -0400
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
> Hey Calvin,
>
> I'm pretty sure DNS over HTTPS runs on top of a TCP stream and not a
> UDP stream.
>
standard DNS requests are made via UDP on port 53. Th
>> In Calvin's sdohd, it's curl doing all of the TCP+TLS+HTTPS heavy
>> lifting. The UDP socket accepts actual DNS requests from the local
>> machine and mangles them into DoH.
I am now thinking we might be able to work this thing entirely as a
script. socat provides a forking solution for incomin
On 3 April 2018 at 16:22, harry666t wrote:
>> There is a small bug on line 34: if the statuscode isn't 200 then the
>> response body is never closed.
>
> Thanks Martin. Fixed.
>
>> Probably not a huge deal since this is a command line client, but in
>> long-running servers this will cause file des
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
