[dev] dmenu-vertical (meillo) slow

2009-10-17 Thread Arian Kuschki
Hi all is it just me or does dmenu with meillo's vertical patch applied get slower and slower the more lines you specify with the "-l" option? Anything more than about ten lines is unusable on my t42 using Ubuntu Karmic development version. Cheers Arian

Re: [dev] dmenu-vertical (meillo) slow

2009-10-18 Thread Arian Kuschki
: > [2009-10-17 12:55] Arian Kuschki > > > > is it just me or does dmenu with meillo's vertical patch applied get slower > > and > > slower the more lines you specify with the "-l" option? Anything more than > > about ten lines is unusable on my

Re: [dev] [patch] xmms like pattern matching for dmenu (update to hg tip)

2010-08-09 Thread Arian Kuschki
Excerpts from Uriel's message of 2010-08-10 02:01:40 +0200: > This seems like a rather clumsy, non-standard and silly way to > implement globbing. > > Implementing * and ? wildcards would be a much better idea. I've been using the original patch for a while already and I find it easier and quicke

Re: [dev] [wmii] wimenu custom completion

2010-08-15 Thread Arian Kuschki
Excerpts from LuX's message of 2010-08-16 00:37:54 +0200: > Example: In bash I have always been missing a history behaving like in > vim. Let me explain this. If you have typed a long command 'cmd' at put "\C-n": history-search-forward "\C-p": history-search-backward and/or "\e[B":history-sea

Re: [dev] [patch] dmenu - support for xft font rendering

2010-09-01 Thread Arian Kuschki
Excerpts from Henri Mannerberg's message of 2010-09-01 12:10:06 +0200: > > This patch adds support for xft font rendering to dmenu (4.1.1). > > Shouts go out to lattenwald (utf8 support) and R. Kyle Murphy (fg color fix) > > The patch can also be found at: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php

Re: [dev] [patch] dmenu - support for xft font rendering

2010-09-01 Thread Arian Kuschki
Excerpts from Ethan Grammatikidis's message of 2010-09-01 19:00:17 +0200: > Connor Lane Smith wrote: > > If someone were to write a simple clean xft patch for libdraw it could > > be useful, perhaps even integrated into mainline. > This may just be my limited perspective, or it may be my upset sto

Re: [dev] [patch] dmenu - support for xft font rendering

2010-09-01 Thread Arian Kuschki
Excerpts from Connor Lane Smith's message of 2010-09-01 21:33:23 +0200: > I'm sympathetic with this view, being a lover of typography myself. But > you're in luck! dmenu, dwm, and libdraw already do support variable-width > fonts. My desktop system runs dmenu in Helvetica. :) great news, glad to

Re: [dev] [patch] dmenu - support for xft font rendering

2010-09-02 Thread Arian Kuschki
I will take a look at the issue with the '-l' switch when I have >> the time. >> >> ... >> >> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:29:37PM +0200, Arian Kuschki wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for this, Henri. The only issue I have is that the font colour >> > does not change when highlighted when I call dmenu with the '-l' option. >> > -- >> >

Re: [dev] Sandy editor

2011-05-27 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 27 May 2011 10:46, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Aurélien Aptel > wrote: > > arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much > > easier to type. > > I meant wasd (on qwerty), obviously. > > that would be just sweet for the myriads of colemak us

[dev] [dwm] segfault

2011-06-22 Thread Arian Kuschki
Hi, after happily having used dwm for years it started to segfault on me in regular intervals since I switched to a new laptop (T43 -> T420s). Not sure what the trigger is yet, /var/log/everything looks shows this: Jun 22 15:25:32 localhost kernel: [11636.771129] dwm[1325]: segfault at 0 ip 0

Re: [dev] [dwm] segfault

2011-06-22 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 22 June 2011 15:44, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Arian Kuschki > wrote: > > How can I diff my local version against tip? > > Check out tip: > > hg clone http://hg.suckless.org/dwm > > Then diff: > > diff /path/to/your/dwm.c /path/

Re: [dev] [dwm] segfault

2011-06-22 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 22 June 2011 16:10, Rob wrote: > Build with debug flags (-g in Makefile) > > Enable coredumps in your .xinitrc > ulimit -c unlimited > > Wait until dwm segfaults > $ gdb --core=path/to/core dwm > > bt > > Voila, you've got the bug's location. > > when i enter ulimit without arguments, the outp

Re: [dev] [dwm] segfault

2011-06-22 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 22 June 2011 15:44, Bogdan Ionuț wrote: > > it segfaults only when "reloading" dwm? then it's pertag related. i > use pertag2 and adding m->mfacts[0] = mfact; in createmon() solves the > issue. > > not sure what you mean by "reloading"? I have a suspicion that the problem has to do with dual d

[dev] [slock] segfault

2011-12-04 Thread Arian Kuschki
Hi, I get a segfault when running slock via my acpi handler script: Dec  4 23:15:00 localhost kernel: [26284.789539] slock[13389]: segfault at 0 ip 7f12b8b57879 sp 7fff74d6d810 error 4 in libnss_files-2.14.1.so[7f12b8b5+b000] It runs fine when called from the command line etc. Any i

Re: [dev] [slock] segfault

2011-12-04 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 4 December 2011 23:55, Rob wrote: > On 4 December 2011 22:19, Arian Kuschki wrote: >> I get a segfault when running slock via my acpi handler script: >> >> Dec  4 23:15:00 localhost kernel: [26284.789539] slock[13389]: >> segfault at 0 ip 7f12b8b57879 sp

[dev] what's your opinion on Go

2011-12-12 Thread Arian Kuschki
Hi all, I would like to learn a new programming language. I do not know C. As I remember positive reactions on this list when Go came out, I would like to know if people still think it might be a 'better C'. One thing I like about Go is that is seems more suitable for server/web stuff, which is wh

Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?

2012-04-04 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 4 April 2012 22:29, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote: > ** > Hi, > > What needs to be done to get the systray patch upstream into dwm? Is there > any chance of getting it upstream or is it a total no go? > > The patch proved to be stable and I continued to refine it over last week. > Please let m

Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?

2012-04-05 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 5 April 2012 19:18, Micheal Smith wrote: > Just updated the patch to apply cleanly with 6.0. Hope that helps. > > Thanks, > Micheal > Thanks for this, unfortunately it still does not apply for me. Actually I think I lost interest in this patch already, it feels too complex. I don't want to m

Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?

2012-04-05 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 5 April 2012 20:42, Micheal Smith wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:40:55PM +0200, Arian Kuschki wrote: > > On 5 April 2012 19:18, Micheal Smith wrote: > > > > > Just updated the patch to apply cleanly with 6.0. Hope that helps. > > > > > > Than

Re: [dev] Multimedia keys doesn't send proper keycodes

2012-04-17 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 17 April 2012 20:17, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote: > > > On 17 April 2012 21:16, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote: > >> try adding >> >> #include >> >> before the keys array >> >> > > or use the keycode directly, instead of the keysymbol > or use xbindkeys to bind those keys, e.g. a ~$ cat .xbindkeysr

[dev] [dwm] tag changes when applications are activated

2012-04-18 Thread Arian Kuschki
Hi, for some time now, not sure how long, dwm changes the displayed tag when an application is activated. E.g. I click a link that is opened in an external program and that program comes into view even if its tag was not visible before. Dwm behaves like OS X now in this regard. Is this a bug or a

[dev] Re: [dwm] tag changes when applications are activated

2012-04-18 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 18 April 2012 09:57, Arian Kuschki wrote: > Hi, > > for some time now, not sure how long, dwm changes the displayed tag when > an application is activated. E.g. I click a link that is opened in an > external program and that program comes into view even if its tag was not &

Re: [dev] [dwm] tag changes when applications are activated

2012-04-18 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 18 April 2012 12:52, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 18 April 2012 08:57, Arian Kuschki > wrote: > > for some time now, not sure how long, dwm changes the displayed tag when > an > > application is activated. > > The blame here is either with dwm or the application,

Re: [dev] dwm tip changes

2012-06-23 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 23 June 2012 20:06, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Also, dwm now disallows resizing/moving/float fullscreen windows, as > this doesn't seem very useful anyways. I haven't tested the changes yet, I just want to say that I find resizing full screen windows useful sometimes. For some apps (e.g. Evince)

Re: [dev] dwm tip changes

2012-06-24 Thread Arian Kuschki
On 24 June 2012 11:01, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I understand your remark. The newly introduced limitation addresses > the moving/resizing by mouse only. Ah, I see. I don't use the mouse for what I described, so as long as full screen windows can still be tiled my use case is covered. Great! > The