Hey there,
> config*.h:
>
> so far, i've been either staying on master, or my personal branch `mine`
> branch, and copying config.def.h to config.h (or, letting Makefile do
> that). then, editing config.h to my heart's content, running make, etc.
>
> that's worked okay.
>
> but, given git (i gu
> https://git.suckless.org/sites/commit/13e1296e9772242ff869295a1081a77eae022434.html
There's no need to change Makefile or anything. You can simply make
`config.h` a symlink to `config.def.h`:
$ ln -s ./config.def.h config.h
This is what I've been doing for a long while now since `confi
Дана 24/09/22 12:09AM, Steffen Nurpmeso написа:
> Fyi this is no longer true with Issue 8. (They also invented, in
> contact and with direct involvement of several make authors,
> things not implemented everywhere (yet) while trying to find a way
> to standardize "delayed-expansion" and "immediate
Дана 24/09/22 09:30AM, Страхиња Радић написа:
> This is perhaps the moment when suckless movement should pick the
> recommended version of POSIX standard (1003.1-2017?), similar to how
> C99 is recommended as the suckless C standard.
About this, on
https://suckless.org/coding_style/
POSIX.1-200
hi. i've sort of been winging things for years now. but i'm curious
about two things in the "suckless user workslow" (with git):
config*.h:
so far, i've been either staying on master, or my personal branch `mine`
branch, and copying config.def.h to config.h (or, letting Makefile do
that). the
Hi Greg,
* Greg Minshall [2024-09-22 10:23]:
but, given git (i guess), i sort of wonder if what i might do is switch
to branch `mine`, edit on config.def.h, hand copy that to config.h?
(well, maybe add, in the version of Makefile in `mine`, a dependency on
config.def.h for the config.h target.)
