On 23/05/05 08:07AM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> I try to take a balanced stance in the GPL vs. MIT discussion, given it
> usually derails into tribalist diatribes on both sides.
Essays have been written and are available online explaining everything about
GPL and related licenses, so there's no need
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:05:39AM +0100, Ray Garner wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been using suckless tools such as dwm and st for a while now and
> think theyre great, my question is to do with software licenses.
>
> I'm curious about licensing and was wondering why suckless tools are
> released under M
On Sat, 6 May 2023 10:56:23 +0200
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
> [2]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html
> [3]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
> [4]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html
Thank you for your very
