Re: [dev] st: no need for scrollback patch or program by using -o option

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:53:41PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote: > I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that > it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all. > So where's the patch? Given that a terminal emulator is a necessary part of the Trusted C

Re: [dev] st: no need for scrollback patch or program by using -o option

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:53:41 -0600 Dave Blanchard wrote: > I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that > it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all. Why do you think it's "poorly written"? I looked at the code when I wanted to add a feature. I r

[dev] rv32 compiler

I am searching for a compiler which would compile for picorv32 processor published YosysHQ. Current gcc toolchain is gigantic and I'm looking for something minimal. Have you folks discovered any projects for the same? Thanking you Sagar Acharya