On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:06:49 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s'
> option exists, but there is no standard which tells us whether
> ranlib(1) is available or not.
while I agree with your point in general, keep in mind that the
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:23:01 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> I've noticed that we use the non-standard ranlib(1) program to create
> symbol tables for archives created by ar(1). This affects, as far as
> I can tell, every creation of static libraries we have.
>
> ranlib(1) is, in fact, le
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:23:01 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> I've noticed that we use the non-standard ranlib(1) program to create
> symbol tables for archives created by ar(1). This affects, as far as
> I can tell, every creation of static libraries we have.
>
> ranlib(1) is, in fact, le
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:06:49 +
Tom Schwindl wrote:
Dear Tom,
> If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s'
> option exists, but there is no standard which tells us whether
> ranlib(1) is available or not.
while I agree with your point in general, keep in mind that the
Greetings comrades,
currently we are at brcon2022 in Belgrade, smoking meats and having fun.
We decided to make it real:
http://www.zuccless.org
Come and join the future of meat!
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Please activate Javascript to see the full signature.
