On 22/07/23 11:06, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> Again, you'd have to rely on a tool which isn't defined.
> If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s' option
> exists, but there is no standard which tells us whether ranlib(1) is available
> or not.
Standards are not the Holy Grail.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:04:05PM +0200, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 22/07/23 11:06, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> > Again, you'd have to rely on a tool which isn't defined.
> > If a system says it's POSIX compliant, we can assume that the `-s' option
> > exists, but there is no standard which tells us whe
