Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 05:26:52PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:23:01PM +, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> > ranlib(1) is, in fact, legacy. It was used to create symbol tables for
> > archives
> > before ar(1) was able to do that by itself.
> > POS
Tom,
> The main "problem" here is that ranlib(1) isn't a standardized tool, so there
> is no guarantee on what its behaviour will be or whether it exists at all.
> We assume it's there because it always has been or GNU and LLVM include it.
an option might be to wait until the bug report comes in
