I was looking for pointers in regards to this error I'm receiving when
using
libxft-bgra(https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxft/-/merge_requests/1).
I explained the issue in
(https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxft/-/merge_requests/1#note_884325):
"This patch (installed through t
On 21/04/19 11:59, Luuk van Baal wrote:
> I was looking for pointers in regards to this error I'm receiving when
> using
> libxft-bgra(https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxft/-/merge_requests/1).
> I explained the issue in
> (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxft/-/merge_requests
On 21/04/19 07:06, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Interesting, I'm not getting this error. I use Artix Linux, libxft-bgra
> 2.3.3.r7.7808631e-1 from AUR, vim 8.2.2653-1 and my modified st which I
> regularly update from suckless repo[1]. Also ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols, *not*
> ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols-mono, a
From: Страхиња Радић
Sent:21/04/19 07:06pm
Subject:Re: [dev] [st] libxft-bgra X Error
> On 21/04/19 11:59, Luuk van Baal wrote:
> > I was looking for pointers in regards to this error I'm receiving when
> > using
> > libxft-bgra(https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxft/-/merge_requests/1).
>
From: Страхиња Радић
Sent:21/04/19 08:07pm
Subject:Re: [dev] [st] libxft-bgra X Error
> On 21/04/19 07:06, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> > Interesting, I'm not getting this error. I use Artix Linux, libxft-bgra
> > 2.3.3.r7.7808631e-1 from AUR, vim 8.2.2653-1 and my modified st which I
> > regularly upda
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, at 11:57, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> Anyway, I can't say it enough: Check out Ada 2012 (and the SPARK
> subset) if you care about "secure" languages. It's not as lean as C, but
> you end up solving so many problems with it, especially in regard to
> software engineering and safety
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, at 11:57, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> Anyway, I can't say it enough: Check out Ada 2012 (and the SPARK
> subset) if you care about "secure" languages. It's not as lean as C, but
> you end up solving so many problems with it, especially in regard to
> software engineering and safety
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:19:18 -0400
Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, at 11:57, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > Anyway, I can't say it enough: Check out Ada 2012 (and the SPARK
> > subset) if you care about "secure" languages. It's not as lean as C, but
> > you end up solving so many problems wi
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, at 16:36, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> For me, libgnat is only dynamically linked if I run gnatbind
> with -shared, but if you -static it should be statically linked.
Thank you. [[ gnatmake hello.adb -bargs -static ]] does the trick, i.e. it
makes the executable larger (of course
On 04/19/21 04:19PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> Okay, I did. Very interesting. I briefly studied Ada many years ago. Do
> you think that Ada is a viable alternative to Rust? Do you think it is a
> decent alternative to C for things like operating systems or utilities like
> sbase or ubase?
>
> I
Jeremy wrote:
> What does Ada(or Rust for that matter) do better than C?
>
> Surely, you have all of the tools for static analysis, debugging, macros
> for C that you would for any other language, no?
>
> I could understand generics, interfaces, iterators, OOP and all of that
> from a masturbator
11 matches
Mail list logo
