[dev] can redo handle phony targets properly?

2021-01-08 Thread Greg Reagle
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 10:56, Greg Reagle wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 09:57, Sergey Matveev wrote: > > > clean) > > > redo-always > > > > No need to add redo-always to the targets that only can be "called" by > > the human/user. User uses "redo" command, that forces specified tar

Re: [dev] can redo handle phony targets properly?

2021-01-08 Thread Sergey Matveev
*** Greg Reagle [2021-01-08 09:55]: >I am experiencing a problem with phony targets in redo [1] Well, this is an issue not with the redo itself, but some of its implementations. My redo implementation (goredo) actually will refuse to work there too, because it has exactly the same safety check. P