Dear Laslo
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:52:15 +0200
> "Silvan Jegen" wrote:
>
> Dear Silvan,
>
> > Yes, the scrollback buffer can be implemented by a different tool like
> > tmux for example. That's why this functionality is not implemented in
> > st from what I understand. Se
On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:48:38 +0200
"Silvan Jegen" wrote:
Dear Silvan,
> I honestly never use tmux either. If I think I may need the output of
> a program, I just redirect it to a file/editor/pager.
yeah, same here. But how often do you get some output and think "oh, I
actually needed that" and
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:40:32AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:48:38 +0200
> "Silvan Jegen" wrote:
>
> Dear Silvan,
>
> > I honestly never use tmux either. If I think I may need the output of
> > a program, I just redirect it to a file/editor/pager.
>
> yeah, same here. Bu
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:43:29 +0200
Hadrien Lacour wrote:
Dear Hadrien,
> If what you said is true about having to reimplement a terminal
> emulator in the scrollback utility, it completely makes sense to
> integrate it.
I'm definitely not an expert in terminal emulators (Roberto, Hiltjo and
Chri
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:27:21 +0200
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> I'm definitely not an expert in terminal emulators (Roberto, Hiltjo
> and Christoph are), but the case is pretty clear to me when I look at
> scroll[0], which Jan and Jochen are working on right now.
> If you look at scroll.c, you can see t
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 01:38:09PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:27:21 +0200
> Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>
> > I'm definitely not an expert in terminal emulators (Roberto, Hiltjo
> > and Christoph are), but the case is pretty clear to me when I look at
> > scroll[0], which Jan and
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 04:40, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:48:38 +0200
> "Silvan Jegen" wrote:
> But how often do you get some output and think "oh, I
> actually needed that"
Yes that happen to me occasionally, which is why I use the scrollback patch for
st. I find it much eas
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020, at 23:42, Damon wrote:
> I am using:
> st 0.8.2 with these patches: font2, scrollback, scrollback-mouse,
> scrollback-mouse-altscreen.
> Chrome 80.0
> bspwm
>
> If I ctrl+shift+c copy something in ST, I can not paste it in Chrome.
I do not experience this problem. I als
Hi Damon,
Quoth Damon:
> I am using:
> st 0.8.2 with these patches: font2, scrollback, scrollback-mouse,
> scrollback-mouse-altscreen.
> Chrome 80.0
> bspwm
>
> If I ctrl+shift+c copy something in ST, I can not paste it in Chrome. The
> right-click menu doesn't work for the address bar or i
On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 09:58:06 -0400
"Greg Reagle" wrote:
Dear Greg,
> Yes that happen to me occasionally, which is why I use the scrollback
> patch for st. I find it much easier to hit Shift+PageUp than to
> rerun a command. And when the output of a command changes with time,
> re-running it mi
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:43:04PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> but I first wanted to test the waters and see how the general opinion here is.
Well, unless the hardcore scrollback-is-for-wimps-and-too-hard-to-maintain crew
hid somewhere until now, there seems to be general agreement that everyone
Hi there,
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 04:00, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:11:09 +0200
> Georg Lehner wrote:
> > A question: why is the scrollback-patch not included in `st` already
>
> exactly my point. I see no reason why there can't at least be a
> scrollback, which defaults to 0 in
12 matches
Mail list logo
