Le 24/03/2019 à 14:33, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
* do not use enum (hard rule)
I'd be glad to get any reason why not. C is already minimalistic, won't
you write in assembly next time?
Moreover, enums are often well supported in debuggers and show the
actual enum constant rather t
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:45:04PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
> There's options. Have you tried Lemon Parser [0] or miniyacc + qbe
> [1][2]? ucpp [3] lexes/parses C-like languages with C pre-processing.
> re2c [4] is a great lexer. Crockford prefers Pratt's Top-Down
> Operator Precedence [5][
Dear David,
You are of the type of human being I, genuinely, sort of dislike. Namely a
syntax
kludge and excessive abstraction lover.
Your first sentence is already an insult to "suckless" people: "won't you write
in assembly next time?"
--
Sylvain
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:56:21PM +, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> You are of the type of human being I, genuinely, sort of dislike. Namely a
> syntax
> kludge and excessive abstraction lover.
>
> Your first sentence is already an insult to "suckless" people: "won't you
I know this is bait but I'll bite:
People who think this shit in real life are insufferable faggots who
have 0 concept of how much abstraction there already is between them
programming in "real" languages bare metal. The amount of abstraction
that's achieved by going from logic gates to C is fucki
Nice April Fool's joke.
--
Sylvain
God! I barely did notice we were the first of April... and I was surprised to
see ideas
so much remote from suckless stated here.
Got me guys. I fell for it.
doh!
--
Sylvain
I was being quite serious. Not everything posted on April 1st is a joke.
I eventually got fed up with harmful.cat-v.org, because all it listed
was derision, but no actual justification. Just like you.
Ciao,
Markus
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:56:21 + sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> You are of the type of human being I, genuinely, sort of dislike. Namely a
> syntax
> kludge and excessive abstraction lover.
>
> Your first sentence is already an insult to "suckless" people: "won't you
> wri
