Martin Kühne writes:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:11 AM, wrote:
>> What I believe[...]
>
> Whose responsibility would it be to test what you believe? It looks a
> lot like you expect us to figure out whether you are on to something
> relevant. I had a dream last night and in that dream I saw the
now that everybody and their kitchen sink has internet it's getting a
bit late for privacy. teaching people not to use android phones is a
nearly pointless activity.
computer security and privacy is now a luxury of the technical elite
and illiterate or offline people.
software has given all the me
hiro wrote:
> try with a small group of people first that actually has a need for privacy.
Heyho,
in the special case where this privacy is to be achieved not with encryption,
authentication and authorization (to limit the number of entities who are
allowed to learn the secret which should be pro
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:21:46AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> now that everybody and their kitchen sink has internet it's getting a
> bit late for privacy. teaching people not to use android phones is a
> nearly pointless activity.
> computer security and privacy is now a luxury of the technical elite
>
moos...@gmail.com writes:
> `valgrind st -f mono-2 cat full-bmp.txt' [1]
>
> Yields quite a few invalid reads from freed blocks, the issue is related
> to cache management. In the real world those dangling pointer issues
> lead to segfaults or X11 errors (eventually)
>
> [1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.u
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 02:48, Martin Kühne wrote:
> I had a dream last night...
Now now. No need to hold contempt on the mailing lists. Suckless isn't
some Linux list where we go off on people who want to help but didn't
read the entire codebase, wiki, and archive before posting.
However, mooso
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Keller wrote:
> Now now. No need to hold contempt on the mailing lists. Suckless isn't
> some Linux list where we go off on people who want to help but didn't
> read the entire codebase, wiki, and archive before posting.
Cool. I'll have to remember this
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:13:40 -0500
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
Hey Wolfgang,
> I’ve seen your opinions on this point a few times and understand your
> position, although I don’t agree with it. Briefly, and without wanting
> to start a flamewar: whatever convenience or legal protection license
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 10:18, Alexander Keller wrote:
> Now now. No need to hold contempt on the mailing lists. Suckless isn't
> some Linux list where we go off on people who want to help but didn't
> read the entire codebase, wiki, and archive before posting.
Uh, yea it is. Where have you been
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> Personally I think it is despicable and anti-progress to discourage bug
> reports.
I specifically asked to make sure it's a bug in st, which I didn't
write. And I no longer have all day to solve any problem that crosses
my path for anyone. Vag
nobody ever has time for me, *cry*
i can't enjoy it cause you keep on talking about licenses.
On 1/23/17, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:13:40 -0500
> Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
>
> Hey Wolfgang,
>
>> I’ve seen your opinions on this point a few times and understand your
>> position, although I don’t agree with
what is lambda?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:18:40AM +, Caleb Malchik wrote:
> I was wondering what the suckless community thinks about various
> projects aimed at Internet decentralisation and privacy
Decentralization results in metadata leakage and therefore reduces
privacy. By splitting the system into compo
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:12:23PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> non-massively decentralized protocols
You probably want to use the word "federated".
Also I don't understand what does "lambda users" mean.
15 matches
Mail list logo
