On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:38 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> the videos of this year's suckless conference in the webm format are
> online. You can view them on the conference page[0].
Thanks for the work!
I added a link to the slides of my talk.
Cheers,
Silvan
I personally feel that Hixie's Laws of the Web (I'm trademarking that
since I just thought of it) #3 & #4 are mishandled but as a result of
the experiences of the early web.
I remember the early "mobile" web (Palm Treo 650 & BB World Edition in
2004-2009). They weren't as bad as many people made
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:12:00AM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> I will soon compile a recent linux kernel (with that c++ garbage which is gcc
> unfortunately) for x86_64/x86 and see if that kbluid was damaged again.
It seems it was damaged again: New scripts, new bash-isms. Wonder who did thos
Hi,
I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like ii[1],
ratox[2], sj[3] or jj[4]. I used the term "ii-like" in my talk at the
slcon3, be
I prefer to call it front-end
On 2016-09-27 15:09, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like
ii[1],
ratox[
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 08:09, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
> years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
> Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like ii[1],
> ratox[2], sj[3] or
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:09:30 +0200
Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hey Jan,
> I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
> years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server
> Program Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools
> like ii[1], ratox[2], sj
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> however, "bioc" or "binoc" might be nice memorable names for the
Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even birco?
cheers!
mar77i
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:49:14 +0200
Martin Kühne wrote:
> Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even
> birco?
Or maybe just birc. :D
--
FRIGN
What's with the table knocking?
On September 26, 2016 7:38:19 PM GMT+02:00, FRIGN wrote:
>Hello fellow hackers,
>
>the videos of this year's suckless conference in the webm format are
>online. You can view them on the conference page[0].
>
>Cheers
>
>FRIGN
>
>[0]: http://suckless.org/conferences/
On September 27, 2016 4:28:34 PM GMT+02:00, mikan wrote:
>What's with the table knocking?
As far as I know that is a way to show appreciation for talks at universities
(at least in Switzerland).
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:42:01 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> As far as I know that is a way to show appreciation for talks at
> universities (at least in Switzerland).
Same in Germany. :)
--
FRIGN
Martin Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> > however, "bioc" or "binoc" might be nice memorable names for the
>
> Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even birco?
Heyho,
This is intended to be used with other chat protocols as well, so I wou
The word binocular comes from two Latin roots, bini for double, and oculus for
eye.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binocular_vision
-- antoniv
14 matches
Mail list logo
