On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:24:46AM +0800, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Yes, make the site static & host on S3/CloudFront. Generate from a DB
> of your stock/inventory. Go lang's html/template makes this painless.
>
> Dynamic bits should be ReactJS chatting with Stripe APIs. I would go
> so far as use Strip
Hi,
noreturn is part of the C11 header stdnoreturn.h. Either use _Noreturn or
include that header beforehand.
See: http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/_Noreturn
Cheers
pgpIkErznIOL8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I am not getting much luck here (do _I_ suck?) :(
dwm and st work great so far and I am well impressed and happy; but any
patches I apply either fail:
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1609/30448.html
(I have since tried git versions, and it fails to build - but more
later, that is on the back-burne
Hi there,
please note the updated schedule[0], especially the dinner location[1]
for tonight.
http://suckless.org/conference
http://www.derwaldgeist.de
Best regards,
Anselm
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:09:36 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> I am not getting much luck here (do _I_ suck?) :(
>
> dwm and st work great so far and I am well impressed and happy; but
> any patches I apply either fail:
>
> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1609/30448.html
>
> (I have since tried git vers
> st.c:337:12: error: ‘histsize’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> Line hist[histsize]; /* history buffer */
In the scroll patch 'histsize' is added to config.def.h, and therefore
to config.h. Didn't that patch apply?
Does your config.h have a line with "#define histsize 5000"?
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:36:21 +0100
Nick Warne wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:32:14 -0300
> Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano) wrote:
>
> > > st.c:337:12: error: ‘histsize’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > Line hist[histsize]; /* history buffer */
> >
> > In the scroll patch '
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:32:14 -0300
Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano) wrote:
> > st.c:337:12: error: ‘histsize’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > Line hist[histsize]; /* history buffer */
>
> In the scroll patch 'histsize' is added to config.def.h, and therefore
> to config.h. Didn't
My bad!
I should have copy the line from the patch itself and not from my config.
On 23 September 2016 at 13:40, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:36:21 +0100
> Nick Warne wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:32:14 -0300
>> Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano) wrote:
>>
>> > > st.c:337:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:43:22 -0300
Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano) wrote:
> My bad!
No way!
I just cloned st again, got the patch, applied, all builds now and
works OK.
Thanks,
Works a treat.
Nick
> I should have copy the line from the patch itself and not from my
> config.
>
> On 23
whats the suckless view of containers and why? what about a
containerized init helper where sinit calls the container program and
then runs daemons and the rest of the system from containers? Do you
feel containers offer additional security/stability?
Just thinking about "cloud" stuff again and da
My personal view is that separate users are enough software separation
for everything that I have ever wanted to do. Dunno about the party line
though.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 05:19 PM, stephen Turner wrote:
> whats the suckless view of containers and why? what about a
> containerized init helper
containers are there to emulate static linking or the common portable
windows programs in the form of a single .exe
there is no security benefit of running more people's software on your computer.
I am new here. I am using devuan + libvirt + lxc containers. I think in
terms of security, it's less secure than a VM, since it shares the
kernel & resources with the host system. But I think it's easier to
backup & update containers. I like that I can just copy a container to
another computer, and
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 12:18 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> containers are there to emulate static linking or the common portable
> windows programs in the form of a single .exe
>
> there is no security benefit of running more people's software on your
> computer.
>
I am reminded of th
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, stephen Turner wrote:
> whats the suckless view of containers and why? what about a
> containerized init helper where sinit calls the container program and
> then runs daemons and the rest of the system from containers? Do you
> feel containers offer additional security/stabil
Only slightly relevant, but I found this on Alan Cox' feed today:
https://ptpb.pw/R5ZJ.jpg
cheers!
mar77i
> Docker daemon is a single, statically
> linked binary.
that's irrelevant. you still need the right version of loonix with
namespaces support, etc.
containers are not independent of the operating system.
On 23 September 2016 at 19:19, stephen Turner
wrote:
> whats the suckless view of containers and why? what about a
Containers are an indicator of conceptual decay. Application developer
code has now become infrastructure and is due to the juniority far
away from any half-standardized protocols. I
19 matches
Mail list logo
