Re: [dev] Re: I wrote a pager

2016-09-20 Thread hiro
Fun is not suckless. :P

[dev] Just discovered dwm

2016-09-20 Thread Nick Warne
Hi all, I stumbled on dwm over the weekend after reading several threads abount the systemd crap - what a great bit of kit dwm is. Running Dillo (latest mercurial version) and claws-mail (latest git version) on Slackware 14.1, my little notebook flies - to boot up (with a BIOS password) and on the

[dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread stephen Turner
Hi, its my first post so i hope I'm not on the wrong group here or being rude. On your site i see you have tested compiling your system with PCC and i also see a SCC in dev. What was the reason you chose to write SCC? Is it due to PCC's reliance on lex, yacc and m4? Bash and Make, I'm lookin

Re: [dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:32:18 -0400 stephen Turner wrote: Hey Stephen, > On your site i see you have tested compiling your system with PCC > and i also see a SCC in dev. What was the reason you chose to write > SCC? Is it due to PCC's reliance on lex, yacc and m4? The last PCC release (1.1.0) wa

Re: [dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread pranomestro
> Hi, its my first post so i hope I'm not on the wrong group here or being > rude. Nope, dev is exactly right for that. > Bash and Make, I'm looking for compatible replacements for these. As i > currently understand it bash at the least is expected to compile the linux > kernel. Is there any

Re: [dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread Greg Reagle
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, at 04:44 PM, FRIGN wrote: > Some people would recommend rc (by Plan9), but it's definitely not > portable Would you mind explaining specifically what you mean by "not portable"? It is my understanding that it works on a lot of Unix-like operating systems and that it is highl

Re: [dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 21 September 2016 at 04:04, Greg Reagle wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, at 04:44 PM, FRIGN wrote: >> Some people would recommend rc (by Plan9), but it's definitely not >> portable > > Would you mind explaining specifically what you mean by "not portable"? > It is my understanding that it works o

Re: [dev] several questions

2016-09-20 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:04:05 -0400 Greg Reagle wrote: Hey Greg, > Would you mind explaining specifically what you mean by "not > portable"? It is my understanding that it works on a lot of Unix-like > operating systems and that it is highly portable. the thing is that 99.9% of people on Linux o