Dear Reimundo,
On 08/14/16 18:23, Reimundo Heluani wrote:
Dear all, first of all congratulations and thank you for surf! it is the
best browser I have come around in years. I am getting a segfault when running
surf-0.7 with the web inspector open trying to debug a page with a java
script. Atta
Hi,
> Are you able to reproduce this with Google Chromium, Epiphany? I’d
> say that it’s a WebKitGTK+ [1] problem, and I’d bring the issue up
> with them.
It is indeed. But Chromium isn't related anymore to webkit.
On Aug 15, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Reimundo,
Are you able to reproduce this with Google Chromium, Epiphany? I’d say
that it’s a WebKitGTK+ [1] problem, and I’d bring the issue up with them.
Thanks, I filed a bug with them. Haven't access at this time to another
webkit-based browser to check th
Dear Reimundo,
On 08/15/16 14:27, Reimundo Heluani wrote:
On Aug 15, Paul Menzel wrote:
Are you able to reproduce this with Google Chromium, Epiphany? I’d say
that it’s a WebKitGTK+ [1] problem, and I’d bring the issue up with them.
Thanks, I filed a bug with them.
Could you please share
On Aug 15, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Reimundo,
Could you please share the URL.
Sure, it's on
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160849
You could test it with some Linux live distribution. (Hopefully, I am
able to test with the GNOME Epiphany browser [1].)
I'm traveling but getting b
Hi there,
On 9 August 2016 at 10:17, FRIGN wrote:
> don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
> belongs to the suckless git-repository.
> Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself,
> but the code doesn't even look suckless to me and there a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Martin Kühne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Britton Kerin
> wrote:
>>> Fix the patches.
>>
>> I have no idea how and I haven't found suckless people fun to work with
>>
>
> Interesting how you switch a virtue (writing code) with laziness
> (telling ot
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> The point is it's *much* easier for you to do it. You know how terminal
> programming works already, I don't. I *could* do it, but it would be
> extremely
> inefficient.
>
I don't know how the current patch implements scrollback and I'm
