On 2016-08-13 07:31, Ben Woolley wrote:
On Aug 12, 2016, at 2:41 PM, ra...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hello!
GNU Bash is 138227 lines of code. I wrote a simpler shell* in 800
lines: https://notabug.org/rain1/s/
*It is not a true POSIX shell. You can't run existing scripts with it.
It's technica
Hi,
I'm not quite sure about this specific design, but I do think there is
still work to be done in shell design. We've not quite got there yet,
I think.
On 12 August 2016 at 22:41, wrote:
> Tokenization [tokenizer.c]: Instead of the strange and complex way that
> normal shells work (where "$X"
On 13 August 2016 at 12:31, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> IO redirection being done by separate programs, though, seems like a
> wrong decision. Streaming the data through a separate process is
> considerably less efficient than just setting a file descriptor to an
> open file, and not always equival
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, S. R. Gal wrote:
>> In fact, like you, I have also integrated `sxiv` into my "photography"
>> workflow, for both selecting potential images, and "analysing" them
>> with a few tools I've wrote myself.
>
> Would you mind sharing them?
I would share them, but unfor
Given the latest thread about `sxiv`, I wanted to open up the
discussion about "suckless" software for photography enthusiasts.
Are there many photographers on this list? Have you found some useful
and "less-sucking" tools to help you in your hobby?
Anything from image ingestion (i.e. copying),
hah...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't tried with compton, but i use:
https://github.com/ttzhou/setroot
This one works fine, thank you.
Cág
On 2016-08-13 12:31, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Is there no support for 'splatting' a string into several strings? rc
has a coherent approach to this, in that each variable is not a string
but a list of strings. 'Splat' should be supported, but only when done
explicitly.
Yeah I believe rc is the
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 4:31 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>
> IO redirection being done by separate programs, though, seems like a
> wrong decision. Streaming the data through a separate process is
> considerably less efficient than just setting a file descriptor to an
> open file, and not always
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
> wrote:
>
> Hi rain1,
>
> Quoth ra...@openmailbox.org:
>> GNU Bash is 138227 lines of code. I wrote a simpler shell* in 800 lines:
>> https://notabug.org/rain1/s/
>>
>> *It is not a true POSIX shell. You can't run existing scripts with
