On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 03:30:53PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > dwm.c:480:4: warning: Use of memory after it is freed
> > unmanage(m->stack, 0);
> > ^
>
> I think the warning is corr
Hi,
the option to disable third-party cookies in surf doesn't seem to work.
After deleting cookies.txt and visiting e.g. ebay with
$ surf -a @ ebay.com
the file contains cookies for advertising.com, doubleclick.net and
others. I would expect that it only stores cookies for ebay.com.
Regards,
Re
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 +0200
> From: Hadrien LACOUR
>
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:26:42AM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
> > I got introduced to s6-rc [0] lately.
> > Do you guys have any experience with it?
> >
> > [0] http://skarnet.org/software/s6-rc/
> >
>
> When I compared daemontool
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Kurt Van Dijck
wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 +0200
>> From: Hadrien LACOUR
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:26:42AM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
>> > I got introduced to s6-rc [0] lately.
>> > Do you guys have any experience with it?
>> >
>> > [0] http://s
Britton Kerin wrote:
> How do you handle udev problems?
Who needs to handle them anyway? Seriously, how many people
in this list use udev? Finally, the whole purpose of it is slightly unclear
to me. It seems that it was made to create new layers, such as, say,
kernel -> udev -> dbus -> GNOME ->
sorry, udev depends on systemd? what did i miss?
> sorry, udev depends on systemd? what did i miss?
"might become". It's already in the tree, what can stop them from
making it a dependency?
> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:58:35 -0800
> From: Britton Kerin
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Kurt Van Dijck
> wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 +0200
> >> From: Hadrien LACOUR
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:26:42AM -0300, Marc Collin wrote:
> >> > I got introduced to s6-rc
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Hadrien LACOUR wrote:
> But when you had to modify or write unit files, it wasn't fun.
Dead easy. And you can even add to the definition rather than rewriting.
> Even if most of the vocabulary is simple, the number of keywords is
> simply too high;
So is
> If you're going to make an argument against systemd, please make a
> stronger one. Repeated noise doesn't help The Cause™, as it seems to be
> around these parts.
why all in pid 1? Seems like they didn't want you to be able to choose,
that sucks. They even gave up the robustness that could hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
