Hi all,
Following this past conversation, I decided to reinstate rune validity
checks in libutf. Since people seem to be using my repo as a
submodule, I decided it was best to cater for that (somewhat
questionable) use case.
> I would have liked to have separated UTF-8 and Unicode support into tw
Hi all,
I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
a program at runtime. One possibility might be to generate C code and
store that in a file and then call the C compiler and then execute the
resultin
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
> anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
> a program at runtime.
Why?
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if others had an opinion on JIT. Suppose we don't need
> anything fancy like adaptive optimisation, but just wanted to compile
> a program at runtime. One possibility might be to generate C code and
> store that in a file
Hey everybody,
I just started tinkering with dwm a couple of weeks ago. And I
especially love how customisable and extensible it is. No weird 'writing
Javascript Applets' or 'hooking into' other functions or fiddling with
cryptic XML files - it's just C code.
However, I really missed being a
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Thomas Oltmann wrote:
> So, what do you think? Do you even feel there's a need for a
> shutdown-menu for dwm? Are you happy with the quality of the source code?
What does it do that dmenu + a shell script can't?
There's several examples of P-code/Pascal VMs around [0][1][2][3].
Some more detailed than others.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-code_machine#Example_machine
[1] http://www.icodeguru.com/vc/10book/books/book4/secg.htm
[2] http://blackmesatech.com/2011/12/pl0/pl0.xhtml
[3] https://github.com
Hi there,
Judging from my experience: I don't use a display
manager, nor dbus, systemd, consolekit etc. I'm
not sure if these things are popular here
(well, systemd at least, as the vast majority here uses
OpenBSD, right?). Also I treat my tty sessions as usual
sessions, i.e. I need X11 only to su
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:28:14AM +0300, Cág wrote:
> Of course, tis just me. I'm sure Arch/Manjaro users
> will find it useful.
Uuuum, systemd does process ACPI events…
C JIT->have a look at tinycc from F. Bellard.
llvm is c++ then, by definition is not suckless and a massive brain damaged
kludged.
cheers,
--
Sylvain
If you don't want to use Lua, what about doing something more like CGI? Then
you can just call the configuration program with what you want a dynamic answer
for. You could then have a simple awk script parse your config file and answer
queries to the host program.
I suggest this because I have
Greetings.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:11:49 +0200 Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:28:14AM +0300, Cág wrote:
> > Of course, tis just me. I'm sure Arch/Manjaro users
> > will find it useful.
>
> Uuuum, systemd does process ACPI events…
acpid does process ACPI events for me. Acpid didn’
Greetings.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 07:12:43 +0200 Thomas Oltmann
wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I just started tinkering with dwm a couple of weeks ago. And I
> especially love how customisable and extensible it is. No weird 'writing
> Javascript Applets' or 'hooking into' other functions or fiddlin
13 matches
Mail list logo
