The two values were previously supplied as "magic constants".
Signed-off-by: Matthias Rabault
This raises another problem with the includes. I had to put some of the
definitions in vis.h, but in turn that made gcc complain that there were
functions declared in vis.h but not defined in this heade
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:41:19 +0100
Matthias Rabault wrote:
> The two values were previously supplied as "magic constants".
Well, apart from this idea, what's the reason for the vis.h-header
and why is it not a separate patch?
--
FRIGN
Heyho,
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Markus Teich said:
> > I would like to open a link in a new tab with ctrl-button1 instead of
> > opening up
> > a new surf instance outside of tabbed.
>
> You can already do it with ctrl-button2 (middle button/wheel). See
> buttonrelease() in source if you re
config.def.h relies on a bunch of definitions made in vis.c. Whenever I would
include config.h outside of vis.c, it would complain, so I put the definitions
in vis.h so that I could include them. There is probably a better solution
though, as I'm no C expert.
As to the separate patch thing, I o
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 23:05:29 +0100
Matthias Rabault wrote:
> Whenever I would include config.h outside of vis.c, it would complain, so I
> put the definitions in vis.h so that I could include them.
So you rewrote/rearranged half of the program instead of RTFM? Do you even know
how the CPP work
