Re: [dev] Re: [sic] [PATCH] Classic Suckless config.{def,}.h configurability

2014-10-19 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 18 October 2014 19:05, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: >> I've attached a revised patch that also adds a couple more configurable >> options. > > Any chance of getting this applied? Yes, I will apply it. -Anselm

[dev] SGI Irix look (4Dwm)

2014-10-19 Thread orangeprince
Hi, Is there any way to get that old classic SGI Irix look (4Dwm) in dwm? Thanks! Ref.: http://sgistuff.net/software/irixintro/ http://neowin.net/forum/topic/1230329-will-windows-9-reintroduce-the-classic-theme/page-2#entry596586645

Re: [dev] SGI Irix look (4Dwm)

2014-10-19 Thread Alexander Huemer
Hi. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 01:20:37PM +, orangepri...@hushmail.com wrote: > Is there any way to get that old classic SGI Irix look (4Dwm) in dwm? I don't know why you would want that. In any case, the underlying concepts of dwm do not match the concepts of 4DWM. What you can do is use FVWM

Re: [dev] SGI Irix look (4Dwm)

2014-10-19 Thread orangeprince
>I don't know why you would want that. Partly because I want to keep things simple, partly because of nostalgia, and partly because I think SGI Irix was coolest thing ever. They were about to take over the world with their massive super computers and cameo appearances in movies like Jurassic Pa

Re: [dev] SGI Irix look (4Dwm)

2014-10-19 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On October 19, 2014 1:51:37 PM EDT, orangepri...@hushmail.com wrote: >>I don't know why you would want that. > >Partly because I want to keep things simple, partly because of >nostalgia, and partly because I think SGI Irix was coolest thing ever. Why not patch dwm to draw the appropriate decorat

Re: [dev] SGI Irix look (4Dwm)

2014-10-19 Thread orangeprince
> Why not patch dwm it to draw the appropriate decorations around windows? It > can't be that difficult to do, and the code base is easy enough to > navigate... Thanks, I'll look into it. > I, for one, am glad they didn't succeed. More commercial workstations may > have slowed the developme