On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 08:42:12PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 18:25, sin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:02:55 +0200 Calvin Morrison
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'd like lock to belong som
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:15:12AM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> as discussed earlier, I worked on the switch_root-tool and successfully
> tested it with my initramfs-setup without problems.
> Let me know what you think.
Cool!
Applied with minor stylistic changes (also removed redundan
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:15:12AM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> as discussed earlier, I worked on the switch_root-tool and successfully
> tested it with my initramfs-setup without problems.
> Let me know what you think.
BTW, what other tools from busybox do you need to use for your ini
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:05:02 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> BTW, what other tools from busybox do you need to use for your
> initramfs-setup?
None.
I plan on switching to dash from the busybox-shell, but all the tools I
need are already included in ubase.
As a matter of fact, with switch_ro
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:49:04 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> A manpage for switch_root would be nice. For the style, have a look
> at the existing manpages in ubase.
I planned on writing a manpage today. I'll send in a patch once it's
finished.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:41:58PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:05:02 +0100
> Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
> > BTW, what other tools from busybox do you need to use for your
> > initramfs-setup?
>
> None.
> I plan on switching to dash from the busybox-shell, but all the tools I
Hello,
as promised you can find the manpage for switch_root attached.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
>From cbda537178adeb75a488dd19fdb084757464271b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FRIGN
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:26:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add switch_root manpage
---
switch_root.1 | 15
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:29:10PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as promised you can find the manpage for switch_root attached.
Applied, thanks.
Renamed it from switch_root.1 to switch_root.8.
Cheers,
sin
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:37:28 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Renamed it from switch_root.1 to switch_root.8.
Thanks, I forgot about that!
--
FRIGN
Hello,
Seems like I neglected the Makefile while adding the switch_root
manpage.
This is now fixed.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
>From 9f879f375a8580c8d3796c08a3104605385d6930 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FRIGN
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:11:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add switch_root.8 to the Makefi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:13:43PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems like I neglected the Makefile while adding the switch_root
> manpage.
> This is now fixed.
Ooops... I need to add all the other manpages we wrote recently!
Good catch.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:13:43PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems like I neglected the Makefile while adding the switch_root
> manpage.
> This is now fixed.
I added them all with an one-liner, thanks for spotting this.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:26:45PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:21:29 +0100
> Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
> > I added them all with an one-liner, thanks for spotting this.
>
> Now, there's one question that has been bugging me for a while:
> If you combined sbase and ubase, woul
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:21:29 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> I added them all with an one-liner, thanks for spotting this.
In the end you were the one to see this, but you're welcome. ;)
Now, there's one question that has been bugging me for a while:
If you combined sbase and ubase, would it
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:31:52 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Have a look at [1][2][3][4]. It is an on-going effort by me and some other
> people to make a distro, morpheus, around ubase/sbase/sinit/smdev etc. You
> can
> find all the tools on our 2f30 git. If you are interested, the dev ch
> Good catch, but I think it makes allowaltscreen == 0 usable, does it?
Correct!
> The issue is that the command xmonad uses to spawn st double-forks the
> process, making the SIGHUP signal not being sent to the correct pid. See
> [1].
Uh. I think this is a fault of momad, but, do you know why another
terminal emulators work fine even with this double fork?
Regards,
--
17 matches
Mail list logo