[dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

Hi all, This is my first journey into the DWM code. I've added a FIFO control file that you can use to simulate any of the existing keybinds. The command names are similar to the functions implementing them. A simple example would be: echo -n term > /tmp/dwm.fifo echo -n focusmon+ > /tmp

Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCH] cookie policy

Hi, another version of the patches, with a command line option added. I'll have a look on monday for implementing a whitelist. On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Quentin Rameau wrote: > Hi, I changed (and attached here) the patch using gtk object class, > hope it is better that way. > >> One questi

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:38:25PM +, sin wrote: > Hi all, > > This is my first journey into the DWM code. I've added > a FIFO control file that you can use to simulate any of the existing > keybinds. I updated the patch to consume all pending events instead of going back to select. I experi

Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCH] cookie policy

Sorry, patches in previous mail were wrong, here are the good ones. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Quentin Rameau wrote: > Hi, another version of the patches, with a command line option added. > I'll have a look on monday for implementing a whitelist. > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Quenti

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

Hello sin, On 1/29/14, sin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:38:25PM +, sin wrote: > The latest patch is here: > http://amnezia.2f30.org/u/sin/patches/0001-Add-DWM-control-FIFO.patch > Do you really need all those do functions? it would seem to me that you could use the same funcs they cal

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:45:30AM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote: > Hello sin, > > On 1/29/14, sin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:38:25PM +, sin wrote: > > The latest patch is here: > > http://amnezia.2f30.org/u/sin/patches/0001-Add-DWM-control-FIFO.patch > > > > Do you really need all t

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

Good evening, sin wrote: > This is my first journey into the DWM code. I've added > a FIFO control file that you can use to simulate any of the existing > keybinds. > > Let me know if this is of interest to anyone and I will post it > to the patches section on the wiki. Very nice! This is stran

Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCH] cookie policy

Quentin Rameau wrote: > Hi, another version of the patches, with a command line option added. > I'll have a look on monday for implementing a whitelist. I _really_ appreciate your work. It seems I will use surf as my primary browser, really soon! Good job. Regards Y.

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:39:56PM +0100, YpN wrote: > Good evening, > > sin wrote: > > This is my first journey into the DWM code. I've added > > a FIFO control file that you can use to simulate any of the existing > > keybinds. > > > > Let me know if this is of interest to anyone and I will po

Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] Add DWM control FIFO implementing all existing keybinds

Quoth YpN: > This is strange because I had the same idea for surf. It would > be really interesting. Cool, I agree, much more useful and sensible than the possibilities for scripting with xprop that currently exist. Don't go overboard and turn it into uzbl though ;)

Re: [dev] swc: A small Wayland compositor

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:09:31 +0100, Markus Teich wrote: > Heyho, > > why do you not put the VT switching and input dev fd handling code into swc. > In > this case the developer implementing a wm would have to do priviledge > dropping. > This leads to one suid executable per wm without the need