On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:29:30 -0600
Eric Pruitt wrote:
Hello
I've just tested it and reproduced it successfully. Also, I confirmed
that everything works find on xterm. I've attached I/O dumps on both st
and xterm.
Apparently, it's not st's fault. After the misspelled word, xterm
receives ^[[24m^
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:29:30 -0600 Eric Pruitt wrote:
> I use st with screen, and I've noticed that when alternating between
> windows inside of screen, character attributes are not always restored
> properly
While we're at it, this might be related (or not):
st + htop: everything fine
st + tmux
> Apparently, it's not st's fault. After the misspelled word, xterm
> receives ^[[24m^[[49m (no underline, reset background), while st
> receives ^[[m^[[49m (reset all, reset background). I'm no expert in
> this, so I hope someone with better knowledge reviews this.
So it means there is a problem
Raimundo Martins dixit:
> st + tmux + htop: some lines get static and dead. Don't know how to
> explain, they just get outdated. ^L fixes it.
I noticed that too. "tmux set -g default-terminal st-256color" solved
that for me.
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:20:31 +0100 Alexander Hof wrote:
> Raimundo Martins dixit:
> > st + tmux + htop: some lines get static and dead. Don't know how to
> > explain, they just get outdated. ^L fixes it.
>
> I noticed that too. "tmux set -g default-terminal st-256color" solved
> that for me.
I a
Hello,
On 12/6/13, Raimundo Martins wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:29:30 -0600 Eric Pruitt wrote:
>
>> I use st with screen, and I've noticed that when alternating between
>> windows inside of screen, character attributes are not always restored
>> properly
>
> While we're at it, this might be re
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:32:45AM -0500, Eon S. Jeon wrote:
> Note that this doesn't happen in tmux, so I recommend giving it a try.
As much as I would like to use tmux, I continue using screen over tmux
because I do not care for how panes act in tmux compared to windows in
screen. I can't test t
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:41:45 -0500 Carlos Torres wrote:
> Try doing that when you notice a problem, you might
> find the solution.
I was just mentioning it because it seemed related. If someone found a
fix, nice. If not then I'm not going to dive into the output of a
multi-colored update-every-sec
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> So it means there is a problem in the terminfo definition. I think
> we only have to look in the terminfo definition of xterm and look for
> ^[[24m, and look if in the same capability we have a ^[[m, and
> think what is
