This crops up whenever you just switched from tab # N+1 to tab # N
and close current tab. unmanage() first decreases lastsel
(so it becomes N) then erroneously tests it against sel and focuses first tab
instead. One can see that focus() would never set lastsel == sel,
so I took liberty to fix this
It's rather annoying when you e.g. scroll in Surf, move your mouse a little bit
too low, and Tabbed starts to switching tabs because you got caught in lower
border area. I don't think this behaviour is intentional or desirable.
---
tabbed.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ta
---
st.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/st.c b/st.c
index 289ecb8..0b1e97a 100644
--- a/st.c
+++ b/st.c
@@ -3211,6 +3211,7 @@ xsettitle(char *p) {
Xutf8TextListToTextProperty(xw.dpy, &p, 1, XUTF8StringStyle,
&prop);
XSetWMName(xw.dpy, xw
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 06:59:34PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 14:25, Martin Kopta wrote:
> > If I create new window, it gets placed on the primary monitor no matter what
> > monitor is currently focused and no matter where mouse cursor is. It is
> > annoying, but (for most apps
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:15:59PM +1000, oneofthem wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:43:00PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:17:42 -0400, Carlos Torres
> > wrote:
> > > I didn't know about this
> > >
> > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQyMTQ
> >
The version 2.0 of swaprootname (1) has seen the world, now with less
race conditions!
swaprootname [1] is your tool of choice for permanently or temporarily
changing root window name, in scripts or regularly in shell.
Unfortunately, previous version suffered from an issue: if you
launched two ins
Hello there,
On 29 July 2013 01:02, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Comments and criticism is welcome.
The net monitor is something I'm looking for, though I'm not sure how
I would integrate it with my current shell script:
https://github.com/kaihendry/Kai-s--HOME/blob/master/.xinitrc#L43
https://github.c
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:26:23PM +0800, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> On 29 July 2013 01:02, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > Comments and criticism is welcome.
>
> The net monitor is something I'm looking for, though I'm not sure how
> I would integrate it with my current shell script:
> https:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:59:06 +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I am very interested in st (as well as other suckless projects)
> on weston/wayland as well.
>
> The wayland protocol seems to be very concise and it certainly does not
> come with all of the legacy baggage of X. That said, I noticed that
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:08:44AM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:59:06 +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > I am very interested in st (as well as other suckless projects)
> > on weston/wayland as well.
> >
> > The wayland protocol seems to be very concise and it certainly does
Kai Hendry dixit:
>And run your C program from systemd? (*duck*)
/me shudders (at the mere thought of “anathema” Poettering software)
Someone actually took my analog clock (written in mksh) and
packaged it for Arsch Linux, with a systemd… whatever they
call initscripts these days… that runs it o
On mán 29.júl 2013 04:39, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Their 100+ Perl and bash scripts are slow because they're opening files
in a humongous directory. They can't subdivide the directory because
they're afraid that they will break the scripts when modifying them.
I posted a comprehensive comment on the
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:47:49 +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> So the reason you would not want dwm to be a shell plugin for Weston is
> that Weston is too focused on fancy modern features, correct?
Eh, maybe I am being a bit too hard on Weston. It just seems to be
growing quite steadily which scares
Bjartur Thorlacius dixit:
> by the censor. In short, ext2/3 directories are linked lists. You can traverse
Are they, still? I thought they had the equivalent of UFS_DIRHASH
nowadays…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs
On mán 29.júl 2013 11:38, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Are they, still? I thought they had the equivalent of UFS_DIRHASH
nowadays…
Ext4 does, optionally.
15 matches
Mail list logo
