Re: [dev] Re: coreutils / moreutils - DC a directory counter

2013-07-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Calvin Morrison dixit: >Its called unionfs if I recall No. Go read it again. >On Jul 25, 2013 9:28 PM, "Thorsten Glaser" wrote: And stop top-posting and full-quoting. Read http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren/ (it’s in German, English and Dutch, so no excuses). bye, //mirabilos -- > emac

[dev] [surf] [PATCH 1/1] remove unused function eval()

2013-07-26 Thread Christian Hesse
Hello everybody, the function eval() is unused, so remove it. Patch is attached. Thanks! -- main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./si

Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCH 1/1] remove unused function eval()

2013-07-26 Thread Alexander Sedov
It is meant to be used in key bindings. 2013/7/26 Christian Hesse : > Hello everybody, > > the function eval() is unused, so remove it. Patch is attached. Thanks! > -- > main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" > "CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris get my mail add

[dev] [sbase] [patch v4] Add df(1)

2013-07-26 Thread sin
Hi, Incorporated Steve's changes as well to make it compile/work on OpenBSD. I realize #ifdef's are terrible but for now it should do the trick until we come up with a proper solution to this. Thanks, sin >From 34e65ec1b392a90f7d46c90c2d67a25dd6219a4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sin Date: Mo

Re: [dev] [sbase] [patch v4] Add df(1)

2013-07-26 Thread Nick
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:51:01PM +0300, sin wrote: > Incorporated Steve's changes as well to make it compile/work > on OpenBSD. I realize #ifdef's are terrible but for now it should > do the trick until we come up with a proper solution to this. Is there really no sensible way to get the requir

RE: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc.

2013-07-26 Thread Robert Schneider
>> hence shoul be in an ifdef linux or something. On the other hand the code is just "Does the proc file exist? No? Then skip this." But yes it could be wrapped in #ifdef __linux__ sections. > Or use setpriority() to make it portable. I don't see how scheduler priority has much influence on OOM

Re: [dev] Re: coreutils / moreutils - DC a directory counter

2013-07-26 Thread Calvin Morrison
Yes master On Jul 26, 2013 3:40 AM, "Thorsten Glaser" wrote: > Calvin Morrison dixit: > > >Its called unionfs if I recall > > No. Go read it again. > > >On Jul 25, 2013 9:28 PM, "Thorsten Glaser" wrote: > > And stop top-posting and full-quoting. > > Read http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren/

Re: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc.

2013-07-26 Thread koneu
On 26.07.2013, at 14:56, Robert Schneider wrote: > I don't see how scheduler priority has much influence on OOM killing. Ya I just realized it after I sent the reply… Turns out however, that it DOES. At least it says so here: http://blog.singhanuvrat.com/tech/the-linux-oom-killer … However this

Re: [dev] [sbase] [patch v4] Add df(1)

2013-07-26 Thread sin
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:14:08PM +0100, Nick wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:51:01PM +0300, sin wrote: > > Incorporated Steve's changes as well to make it compile/work > > on OpenBSD. I realize #ifdef's are terrible but for now it should > > do the trick until we come up with a proper soluti

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] 8bit-meta like xterm

2013-07-26 Thread Mihail Zenkov
This changes break alt+i/alt+o/alt+p/etc in mc.