The attached patch shows my current work on adapting sltar
to sbase. It is functional, but, there are still open questions
regarding tar. The big deal is the argument parsing: I would
like to use the ARG macros in tar, but I'm not sure how that
fits with the average tar invocation.
In short, how
On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David" wrote:
>
> In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
$ tar czf filename.tar.gz foldername
$ tar tzf filename.tar.gz
$ tar xzf filename.tar.gz
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
On 06/07/2013 8:20 PM, "Dmitrij Czarkoff" wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David"
> wrote:
> >
> > In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
>
> $ tar czf filename.tar.gz foldername
> $ tar tzf filename.tar.gz
> $ tar xzf filename.tar.gz
>
> ---
Also
$ tar cjf file.tar.bz2 folder
$ tar cJf file.tar.xz folder
and
$ tar xf filename.tar.
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:30:39PM +1000, Daniel Bryan wrote:
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
> On 06/07/2013 8:20 PM, "Dmitrij Czarkoff" wrote:
>
> > On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David"
> > w
Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On 06/07/2013 8:30 PM, "Daniel Bryan" wrote:
>
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
Sorry, this should have been:
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz -C ~/scratch/
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:40 AM, sekret wrote:
> * Adam Brand [06.07.2013 01:12]:
> > It's only alt-shift-enter; if I do alt-p then run st (or lxterm or
> > whatever) things work fine.
>
> The question is: What's in your config.h for this key combination
> Alt-Shift-Enter?
>
>
Launching the termi
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:29:02PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
Yeah. Old habit.
On 2013-07-06 10:52, Adam Brand wrote:
> The problem ended up being that the Terminus font wasn't installed. Maybe a
> good add to the requirements for install (xfonts-terminus)?
There is no "requirements" file, what do you mean? If you are talking about
package dependencies, the package has nothi
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 10:59:36 -0400 Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:29:02PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
>
> Yeah. Old habit.
I also see it a lot in scripts, along with using full options instead
of short--perhaps to b
On Jul 6, 2013 5:04 PM, "Andrew Hills" wrote:
>
> So, for compatibility, perhaps it is best to allow both.
You mean the whole lot of GNU tar long options including filename rewriting
and masks? I don't see any way such implementation could fit "suckless"
principles.
I would suggest a subset of P
On 2013-07-06, at 12:15, David Galos wrote:
> In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
My habit relays on compression scheme detection:
tar cf foo.txz ~/stuff
tar xf bar.tbz
-Truls
>I would suggest a subset of POSIX tar options. It could be possibly
>amended with "z", "Z", "j" and "J" options, though using
>
>A $ tar c dirname | gzip -9c > filename.tar.gz
>
>or
>
>A $ tar cf - dirname | gzip -9c > filename.tar.gz
I usually use:
gunzip < fil
Greetings.
In afgets() the size variable is never updated, which usually means it is always
zero, in which case it has no purpose at all. I believe it is supposed to be
updated on realloc? This way, calling afgets multiple times with the same
arguments will reuse the space if possible.
Also, the
> I also see it a lot in scripts, along with using full options instead
> of short--perhaps to be more verbose? So, for compatibility, perhaps it
> is best to allow both.
If you mean GNU --long-options, then never in a million years :) If
you mean both dashed and non, that is likely what I will do.
15 matches
Mail list logo
