[dev] mail clients

Are there any mail clients that don't suck?

Re: [dev] mail clients

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens wrote: > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck.

Re: [dev] mail clients

On 06/10/13 at 01:20pm, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > wrote: > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. > I always assumed that "suckless" was a nod to mutt's slogan: "All

Re: [dev] mail clients

* Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > wrote: > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. In case you don't instantly see this in Claws and didn't look into the header

[dev] Re: mail clients

Uli Armbruster writes: > * Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens >> wrote: >> > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? >> >> Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. > > In case you don't instantly see this in Cl

Re: [dev] mail clients

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:18:50PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > > wrote: > > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. >

Re: [dev][sbase][PATCH v2] Various fixes, add renice command.

The only useful changes to nice here are the move of usage, which is more stylistically consistent with the rest of the source, and the proper POSIX return value. I was under the impression that this project includes ARGBEGIN/ARGEND macros specifically to avoid getopt, so I see no reason to change