On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:58:39 +0100 Raphaël Proust
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 29 March
Attached is a patch enabling HTTP redirection following by curl, for
the download stuff in curl. This is useful as a bunch of websites
rely on 302 redirects for their download sections, Project Gutenberg
being a good example.
>From 0a9009669fd9a9bba0ffe873a3ad3c2ca24e1db5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
Raphaël Proust:
> The problem is: xbindkeysrc has now idea about $PWD so it doesn't work
> with relative path.
https://github.com/baskerville/sxhkd
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> Raphaël Proust:
>
>> The problem is: xbindkeysrc has now idea about $PWD so it doesn't work
>> with relative path.
>
> https://github.com/baskerville/sxhkd
>
I'll have a look at the difference between sxhkd and xbindkeys, but I
don't see h
done.
it would be nice if someone could check my english though. ;)
--Markus
Am 29.03.2013 19:47, schrieb Raphaël Proust:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Markus Teich
>> Do you think it is worth adding to the wiki?
>
> Yes.
Raphaël Proust:
> I don't see how sxhkd can deal with $PWD.
My bad: I misread you.
actually looking at this, thinking... wat?
> preview `find 2012-03*.jpg` | less
yeah, that's what I also type when I'm drunk, but it's wrong and
leaves matching the files to the shell instead of to find. you were
looking for -name.
> What are you guys using as a plumber in daily work?
after see
Hello,
I tried to code a function to show in the bar various informations.
The function show, line per line, the content of /tmp/dwmbuf.
It's useful for notification of mcabber, downloads or anything you want.
You just have to do it :
echo "my notification" >> /tmp/dwmbuf
As I'm not a good progr
Am 30.03.2013 16:00, schrieb Thuban:
> As I'm not a good programmer, please correct and modify this function.
Which function? attachement? ;)
--Markus
Raphaël Proust writes:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>> On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick wrote:
>>> […]
>>
>> While I find many of those features useless, some of them are plain
>> cool, and are innovative. Why are we stuck with a text terminal when
>> we aren't using
Sorry.
Here are the file containing the function :
http://dwm.suckless.org/dwmstatus/dynamic_info.c
And in attachement, see tmpinfo() function.
Regards,
Le 16:42:33 le 30 mars 2013 , Markus Teich a écrit :
> Am 30.03.2013 16:00, schrieb Thuban:
> > As I'm not a good programmer, please correct
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Markus Teich
wrote:
> done.
>
> it would be nice if someone could check my english though. ;)
Looks okay to me. (Although I am never sure about plurals when there
is none of something (i.e. "no tag" vs "no tags").)
>
> --Markus
>
>
> Am 29.03.2013 19:47, schrieb
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Christian Neukirchen
wrote:
> Raphaël Proust writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison
>> wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick wrote:
[…]
>>>
>>> While I find many of those features useless, some of them are plain
>>> cool, and are i
-your indentation style is inconsistent, decide if you want to use tabs
or spaces, in context of the file: use tabs!
-return does not need braces.
-the /tmp/.dwmbuf.tmp could get filled up if a process is misconfigured
and spams /tmp/dwmbuf with lots of lines. You only retrieve one line per
second.
Raphaël Proust writes:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Christian Neukirchen
> wrote:
>> Raphaël Proust writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison
>>> wrote:
On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick wrote:
> […]
While I find many of those features useless, some o
Le 17:37:54 le 30 mars 2013 , Markus Teich a écrit :
> -your indentation style is inconsistent, decide if you want to use tabs
> or spaces, in context of the file: use tabs!
Damn! I thought this problem was soved in my vim configuration...
> -return does not need braces.
OK
> -the /tmp/.dwmbuf.tmp
Am 30.03.2013 18:45, schrieb Thuban:
> Le 17:37:54 le 30 mars 2013 , Markus Teich a écrit :
>> -your indentation style is inconsistent, decide if you want to use tabs
>> or spaces, in context of the file: use tabs!
> Damn! I thought this problem was soved in my vim configuration...
from my .vimrc:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Markus Teich
wrote:
>
>
> from my .vimrc:
> " show whitespace
> set list listchars=tab:╺╴,eol:¬,trail:·,extends:→,precedes:←
and
set noexpandtab
he doesn't need to have set listchars, he can toggle set list and set
nolist when needed to check for ^t
>
> --Markus
Comrades,
I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call print:
http://mutantturkey.com/print/
All it does is print the specified line from a file.
example usage:
$ print constitution.txt 1
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
$ p
On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Comrades,
>
> I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call
> print:
#!/bin/sh
sed -ne "$2"p "$1"
Calvin Morrison writes:
> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
> one thing well.
It has a format string vulnerability. Also, sed or awk do this
trivially already.
--
Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.org
On 30 March 2013 21:49, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Calvin Morrison writes:
>
>> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
>> one thing well.
>
> It has a format string vulnerability.
Good catch thank you!
>Also, sed or awk do this trivially already.
Sed and awk
awesome!!! that is the coolest pocket knife EVER!
JUST BOUGHT IT!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 30 March 2013 21:49, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>> Calvin Morrison writes:
>>
>>> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
>>> one thing
On 03/30/2013 18:28, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Comrades,
I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call print:
http://mutantturkey.com/print/
All it does is print the specified line from a file.
example usage:
$ print constitution.txt 1
We the People of the United State
On 30 March 2013 22:27, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On 03/30/2013 18:28, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>
>> Comrades,
>>
>> I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call
>> print:
>>
>> http://mutantturkey.com/print/
>>
>> All it does is print the specified line from a file.
>>
>>
On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
> one thing well.
Or perhaps you're just learning C and wanted someone to review your code.
Style issues:
* Error messages should be sent to stderr (s/printf(/fprintf(stderr, /
on error-m
On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> - What guarantee do you have that the input file won't contain any lines
>> with length > LINE_MAX? As far as I know, that's an arbitrary number,
>> and
>> there is no intrinsic limit on the length of the lines in a Unix text
>> file.
>
> I didn't feel very g
On 30 March 2013 22:30, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
>> one thing well.
>
> Or perhaps you're just learning C and wanted someone to review your code.
A bit of both really, a good code review is
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Calvin Morrison
wrote:
> Should I have a seperate declaration and then intialization later or
> just combine the statements:
>
> int line = atoi(argv[2]);
>
> or
>
> int line;
> line = atoi(argv[2]);
>
that is a style question, most people like to read the functio
On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 30 March 2013 22:30, Robert Ransom wrote:
>> On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>>> What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
>>> one thing well.
>>
>> Or perhaps you're just learning C and wanted someone to review your code.
>
I really don't see the need for a tool like this. Saying sed and awk are
not suckless is like saying C is not suckless -- sed and awk are languages
with a very specific domain, text processing. Perhaps you think *an
implementation* sucks. Good. GNU coreutils packages awful versions of
awk/sed. If y
31 matches
Mail list logo
