Am Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:28:26 +1100
schrieb Sam Watkins :
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > I am proposing a migration of all mercurial to git repositories.
>
> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> and I need to say this is o
Greetings.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:49:59 +0100 Carlos Torres wrote:
> Hello,
> Attached you'll find a simple patch that makes the DOWNLOAD macro
> use the cookiefile variable.
Thanks, the patch is applied.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
This patch limit refresh rate by new (more efficient) way. Patch
separate refresh in tree case:
1. app send something to terminal
2. we have XEvent
3. post XEvent
In first case we can limit refresh to quite low rate (in patch 5 fps)
to prevent useless overflow when app send to many text (progress
Hi guys,
I already started a similar topic some months ago where I asked you your
opinion. Now, the project seems to move fast, this is why I start another
subject.
The aim is different now, and I want to have some details from Suckless
community / developpers about the upcoming technology.
After
On 13/02/2013, Hugues Moretto-Viry wrote:
> I already started a similar topic some months ago where I asked you your
> opinion.
> Now, the project seems to move fast, this is why I start another
> subject.
> The aim is different now, and I want to have some details from Suckless
> community / deve
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:56:44AM +0100, Jens Nyberg wrote:
> People who can not grasp git thinks it's bad, it's that simple.
The git core is really very good and even almost suckless.
The git front end is very functional and capable, but also a catastropic
chaos of bolted on inconsistent nonsen
> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software
> I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky...
> tell what you did
Ok, here is one day in the life of messing about with git.
Are you kidding me? Are you unaware of git rebase?
On 14 February 2013 10:01, Sam Watkins wrote:
> > I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> > and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software
> > I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure,
There is nice new LWN coverage on Wayland here:
http://lwn.net/Articles/536862/
Embrace change :)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:20:10PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> > because major distribs like Fedora or Ubuntu plan to use it.
>
> They can use clay tablets for all I care.
there is no way any linux distro in the foreseeable future will drop
support for Xlib, that would be ridiculous. If they use Weyl
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:07:36AM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> Are you kidding me? Are you unaware of git rebase?
git rebase is slower and does not always work, I don't really want to go into
the gory details
Greetings.
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:25:19 +0100 Hugues Moretto-Viry
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I already started a similar topic some months ago where I asked you your
> opinion. Now, the project seems to move fast, this is why I start another
> subject.
> The aim is different now, and I want to have
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:01:03PM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> > I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> > and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software
> > I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky...
>
> > tell wha
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
> There is nice new LWN coverage on Wayland here:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/536862/
>
> Embrace change :)
>
choke on paywalls.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
[...]
>
> Learn to code C, send in patch
14 matches
Mail list logo
