On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> http://sprunge.us/QMMS
>
> someone requested that on IRC and i had it.
>
> Enjoy!
>
You can also use shellscripting and do something like this:
#!/bin/sh
read input
token=$(printf "%s" "$input" | cut -b 1-2)
stuff=$(printf "%s" "$input" |
Hey,
way too late, but I just wrapped up the current git head of ii[0]
to an 1.7 release. The archive is available at [1].
1.7 (2013-01-05)
- -k now specifies an environment variable that contains the
server key. This behaviour has been changed in order to not
expose the password
On 12/29/2012 12:20 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
Initially I was worried that the newer version was somehow slower to
the version I was running before.
Not slower, but definitely bigger. The stripped executable is now 16x
the size of that from the 0.3 release -- thanks, no doubt, to these font
cach
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:57:21 +0100 Charlie Kester wrote:
> On 12/29/2012 12:20 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > Initially I was worried that the newer version was somehow slower to
> > the version I was running before.
>
> Not slower, but definitely bigger. The stripped executable is now 16
On 01/05/2013 06:57 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:57:21 +0100 Charlie Kester wrote:
On 12/29/2012 12:20 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
Initially I was worried that the newer version was somehow slower to
the version I was running before.
Not slower, but definitely bi
Thanks hiltjo!
On Jan 5, 2013 7:29 AM, "Hiltjo Posthuma" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Carlos Torres
> wrote:
> > http://sprunge.us/QMMS
> >
> > someone requested that on IRC and i had it.
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
>
> You can also use shellscripting and do something like this:
>
> #!/bin/s
On 01/05/2013 07:33 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
On 01/05/2013 06:57 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:57:21 +0100 Charlie
Kester wrote:
On 12/29/2012 12:20 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
Initially I was worried that the newer version was somehow slower to
the version I was r
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:55:12 +0100 Charlie Kester wrote:
> Of course, some growth is expected as new features are added, but going
> from 38k to 618k is hard to swallow.
On my system:
% ls -hs st-0.3/st
126K st
% strip st-0.3/st && ls -hs st-0.3/st
48
On Jan 5, 2013 1:21 PM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> What are the list's opinions?
>
Extract the keys to another header, categorize keys somehow, add defines in
config.mk to include/exclude different category keys. Or document defines
in readme. Possible categories: EXTENDED_FN,
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:31:13 +0100 Peter Hartman
wrote:
> Attached.
Thanks, the changes were applied.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
On 01/05/2013 09:55 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:55:12 +0100 Charlie Kester wrote:
Of course, some growth is expected as new features are added, but going
from 38k to 618k is hard to swallow.
On my system:
% ls -hs st-0.3/st
126K st
> >That’s only partially true. The array is adding 48k, which another patch
> >series will reduce. Most of the additional memory usage is due to the
> >font handling. So the inability of font handling in X.org/Fontconfig is
> >the reason why too much has to be done over and over again. Yet ano
12 matches
Mail list logo
