Re: [dev] [surf] [patch] Don't load favicon.ico

2012-12-06 Thread Nick
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:58:19AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > I can’t apply this patch. It’s living on the assumption that favicons > will end in »favicon.ico«. Really blocking the favicon would require > to use the situation of webkit, where it really does that blind request > for t

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
Dude, I can tell you I'm very interested about this project. I will follow you. Good work! 2012/12/6 Strake > Hello all. Starch Linux has its own web site now: > http://starchlinux.org > so further announcements will be made there. > > As a reminder, the earlier thread: > http://lists.suckless.o

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread James Christopher Hogg
I am interested too. If you'll avoid systemd, dbus and similar stuff, I'll think about contribution. > Hello all. Starch Linux has its own web site now: > http://starchlinux.org > so further announcements will be made there. > > As a reminder, the earlier thread: > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Prakhar Goel
Have you thought of using something like NIX? The implementation sucks but the idea there: completely reproducible builds is incredible. -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

Re: [dev] [surf] [patch] Don't load favicon.ico

2012-12-06 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:34:04 +0100 Nick wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:58:19AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > I can’t apply this patch. It’s living on the assumption that favicons > > will end in »favicon.ico«. Really blocking the favicon would require > > to use the

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Raphael Proust
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Strake wrote: > Hello all. Starch Linux has its own web site now: > http://starchlinux.org > so further announcements will be made there. Any plan to integrate an RSS feed? (or similar?) > > As a reminder, the earlier thread: > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1210/

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Prakhar Goel
Also, may I recommend s6 as the init system? It follows the suckless philosophy: mionimal, does exactly what is needed and is stable. http://www.skarnet.org/software/s6/why.html -- Warm Regards Prakhar Goel LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311

[dev] Re: Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Strake
Hugues Moretto-Viry wrote: > Dude, I can tell you I'm very interested about this project. > I will follow you. > Good work! Thanks! James Christopher Hogg wrote: > I am interested too. > If you'll avoid systemd, dbus and similar stuff, I'll think about > contribution. Like the plague. Prakhar

Re: [dev] Re: Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Julian Dammann
> Maybe a 9p feed. What's a 9p feed? (I google'd - no luck)

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Truls Becken
On 2012-12-06, at 05:15, Strake wrote: > Starch Linux has its own web site now: http://starchlinux.org > so further announcements will be made there. Where should discussions take place? The home page does not mention any community links. The installation guideline suggests using the Arch instal

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
There is a little bug at the right of the page. I can scroll horizontally and then I see a little white space at the top right. I'm on Firefox 17. If you need a screenshot, just ask me.

[dev] Re: Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Strake
Julian Dammann wrote: > What's a 9p feed? that I serve my news directory over 9p (^_~) Truls Becken wrote: > Where should discussions take place? > The home page does not mention any community links. Well, we have none yet, but we have a few options: * Mailing list My preferred, but as the site

Re: [dev] Starch has a web site

2012-12-06 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Truls Becken wrote: > The installation guideline suggests using the Arch installer. That's fine, but > I'd just like to mention that I always found it fascinating how you can > install > Arch by booting any Linux system you have at hand (an existing installation or

[dev][dwmstatus][patch] Add a simple net usage display function

2012-12-06 Thread Silvan Jegen
Hello everyone I attached a patch adding a simple helper function that displays the current up- & down-speed of the eth0 interface. It parses /proc/net/dev to gather the needed information which seemed like the easiest way to do it. Since I am no C expert, comments, feedback and/or constructive c

Re: [dev][dwmstatus][patch] Add a simple net usage display function

2012-12-06 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:37:54 +0100 Silvan Jegen wrote: > Hello everyone > > I attached a patch adding a simple helper function that displays the > current up- & down-speed of the eth0 interface. It parses /proc/net/dev > to gather the needed information which seemed like the easiest w

Re: [dev][dwmstatus][patch] Add a simple net usage display function

2012-12-06 Thread Silvan Jegen
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:37:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings. > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:37:54 +0100 Silvan Jegen wrote: > > Hello everyone > > > > I attached a patch adding a simple helper function that displays the > > current up- & down-speed of the eth0 interface. It parses

Re: [dev][dwmstatus][patch] Add a simple net usage display function

2012-12-06 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:11:04 +0100 Silvan Jegen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:37:54PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:37:54 +0100 Silvan Jegen wrote: > > > Hello everyone > > > > > > I attached a patch adding a simple helper functi

[dev] [dwm] Patch: Updated BUGS file

2012-12-06 Thread Mahdi Khanalizadeh
Hello folks! Apparently a bug I discovered vanished. dwm didn't handle resizing X well (with xrandr -s) for some strange reason, now it does. Attachement removes the bug from the BUGS file. Best regardsdiff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index 6c9574a..7673d36 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -1,13 +1,5