Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'ridiculously abysmal tar'). Today, I reached a point where I can show that
piece of software to you.
It currently supports the tar oper
On 2012-11-06, at 12:00, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> It currently supports the tar operations c, t and x (which makes it a bit
> more useful than sltar) and the options -f, -C, -v, -z and -j (for
> decompression only).
Cool. Did you consider auto detecting compression from file name and/or conte
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
> implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
> 'ridiculously abysmal tar'). Today, I reached a point whe
* Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'ridiculously abysmal
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> * Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2012-11-06 16:20]:
> >On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair
> >wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
>
I just upgraded my st install to latest tip, and now all the line drawing
characters (such as in mutt) are a lowercase 'd'. This seems suboptimal.
Older st versions had stuff in config.h for configuring these, but that
seems gone now.
What is the right way to fix this?
--
Stephen Paul Weber
On 6 November 2012 11:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Krennmair
> wrote:
> > * Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2012-11-06 16:20]:
> > >On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair
> wrote:
> > >> Hello everyone,
Gentlemen,
Because, unfortunately, you sometimes have a mouse in your hand...
Here's a patch to add support for buttons 4 and 5 on your mouse (usually
the scroll wheel). Like the keyboard bindings in conf.def.h, you can
choose strings to write to the tty upon pressing these buttons (well,
upon sc
> I just upgraded my st install to latest tip, and now all the line
> drawing characters (such as in mutt) are a lowercase 'd'. This
> seems suboptimal. Older st versions had stuff in config.h for
> configuring these, but that seems gone now.
I just have tested it and it seems work for me. What
Somebody claiming to be Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
I just upgraded my st install to latest tip, and now all the line
drawing characters (such as in mutt) are a lowercase 'd'. This
seems suboptimal. Older st versions had stuff in config.h for
configuring these, but that seems gone now.
You're not saying that emacs sucks right?
I couldn't resist...
On Nov 6, 2012 1:51 PM, "Brandon Invergo" wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> Because, unfortunately, you sometimes have a mouse in your hand...
>
> Here's a patch to add support for buttons 4 and 5 on your mouse (usually
> the scroll wheel). Li
> >I just have tested it and it seems work for me. What locale are you using?
>
> en_CA.UTF-8
>
> I'm using the font string
> "Terminus:pixelsize=20:antialias=false:autohint=false"
In this moment, others different fonts of Liberation Mono give problems,
maybe you should try test with Liberation M
Somebody claiming to be Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
In this moment, others different fonts of Liberation Mono give problems,
maybe you should try test with Liberation Mono and report here the result.
If I switch to Liberation Mono it works. This is a pretty serious
regression, since I
For what it's worth, I'd submitted a patch (attached) to Gottox, the
guy who wrote sltar, which added creation support, but he never wound
up applying it.
With that, and pipes to gzip, or bzip2, you can have all the tar
functionality you know and love.
But, at the same time, plan9 tar works well,
On 11/06/2012 08:22 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
I just have tested it and it seems work for me. What locale are you using?
en_CA.UTF-8
I'm using the font string
"Terminus:pixelsize=20:antialias=false:autohint=false"
In this moment, others different fonts of Liberation Mono give prob
> You're not saying that emacs sucks right?
No, I'm not.
I forgot to add that those escape sequences for Emacs will work fine in
less and man pages and such, since they are the same as hitting the up
and down arrow keys. The only difference is in programs with a cursor.
-brandon
Quoth Galos, David:
> For what it's worth, I'd submitted a patch (attached) to Gottox, the
> guy who wrote sltar, which added creation support, but he never wound
> up applying it.
cls wrote really good clean create support for sltar, I'm pretty
sure. He should have copied the code into sbase, bu
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:48:47 +0100 Jean-Paul DEUX wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 08:22 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> >>> I just have tested it and it seems work for me. What locale are you using?
> >> en_CA.UTF-8
> >>
> >> I'm using the font string
> >> "Terminus:pixelsize=20:antial
Back in the '90s many companies bragged about the "thousands and
thousands of lines of code in X or Y program".
You seldom see those nowadays being that announcing the lines of codes is
equivalent of announcing how much bloat there is in their code.
Honestly, a good program does not have to be
On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
>
>
> No. There was only one person pretending go to be suckless because of
> its pseudo Plan 9 heritage.
>
>
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Cheers,
Alex
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:58:09PM +1100, Alex Hutton wrote:
> Which languages qualify as suckless?
Loglan for new development, English for legacy support.
Hope this helps
On 7 November 2012 09:58, Alex Hutton wrote:
> Which languages qualify as suckless?
Have you not noticed http://hg.suckless.org/ ?
In other words,
It's a big difference between the number of lines for a software and the
understanding of the fonction and the operations, and I think it's the
point.
The Suckless meaning, in this perspective, to be easily accessible
to the understanding of anybody, like the principle of unix.
S
C++ & Java.
On Nov 7, 2012 2:58 AM, "Alex Hutton" wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
>>
>>
>> No. There was only one person pretending go to be suckless because of
>> its pseudo Plan 9 heritage.
>>
>>
> Wh
> Which languages qualify as suckless?
Only Brainfuck. Anything more is superfluous.
Obviously C. Also you have to love Xlib, GTK+ and vintage console terminals.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Alex Hutton wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
>>
>>
>> No. There was only one person pretendi
> If I switch to Liberation Mono it works. This is a pretty serious
> regression, since I used to be able to use whatever font I wanted
> without issue.
It is a problem related to the switch to Xft. It impossible a font
has all the unicode glyphs, so if the font fails in a glyph you have
27 matches
Mail list logo
