Hello,
> * CHT, TBC and HTS support (Thanks Roberto Caballero!)
The name is Roberto Vargas (latin people have 2 surnames, so, short form of
the name uses the first surname ;) ).
I send other patch in this mail for CBT (back tabulation), and also this
patch fixs a bug in the previous.
Si
On 23 August 2012 16:11, Joaquim Pedro França Simão wrote:
> I wonder if there is any news about stali. I searched the mail list, but had
> no activity on this recently.
No real news yet on stali, but the project is already on the top of my
long TODO list. I actually consider investigating
http:/
Hi Jan,
On 18 August 2012 12:26, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Thanks to hwi...@gmail.com I discovered an interesting, I'd say broken,
> behavior when using dwm in a cloned screen setup, i.e. connect a laptop
> to a beamer. In the archives I only found this lengthy thread
> (http://lists.suckl
On 20 August 2012 16:31, Josh Rickmar wrote:
> Rebuilt my GTK with this patch and it did wonders; thanks for looking
> into this! You should also post this patch to that Evince bug report
> to get more feedback.
I consider this as a won't fix for dwm and not for my TODO list then ;)
-Anselm
On 14 August 2012 19:36, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Recently on the Arch mailing list there has been much discussion of
> different init systems. I was just wondering which init system, y'all
> approve of. SysV or OpenRC pretty suckless and unix-y to me.
>
> What do you think?
init should just exec
On 5 July 2012 02:05, z_axis wrote:
> No matter chinese or english, i will lose focus accidently even striking
> UP/DOWN keys.
>
> It seems losing focus is relative to some pecial applications, such as
> opera, VBOX, etc. However, xterm doesnot lose focus up to now.
I don't consider this to be a
Executables in etc? :)
On Aug 30, 2012, at 20:26, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 14 August 2012 19:36, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> Recently on the Arch mailing list there has been much discussion of
>> different init systems. I was just wondering which init system, y'all
>> approve of. SysV or OpenRC
> Executables in etc? :)
Aside from the historical precedent, even OpenBSD runs scripts located in /etc.
-sl
On 5 July 2012 02:31, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 07/05/12 at 12:35am, Eckehard Berns wrote:
>> Ok, I'm dump. I tried three times to describe what happens here without
>> boring everyone to death - and I failed. So I deleted everything I
>> wrote. The gist of it is that fceux needs to use some hac
On 24 June 2012 20:32, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> * Anselm R Garbe [23.06.2012 20:06]:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I pushed [..] some fullscreen handling changes into hg tip today.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Also, dwm now disallows resizing/moving/float fullscreen windows, as this
>> doesn't seem very useful anyways
On 30 August 2012 14:40, wrote:
>> Executables in etc? :)
>
> Aside from the historical precedent, even OpenBSD runs scripts located in
> /etc.
>
> -sl
>
I don't really care where my executables are as long as my paths are
setup correctly. Which they are.
On 30 August 2012 20:37, pancake wrote:
> Executables in etc? :)
I don't mind breaking the rules and moving it to /bin/, but I need the
system running first to get a feel for it.
I'm looking forward to it. I reckon you have looked at tinycore once?
They did some of the things you mentioned (for example I have tinycore
on SD and load all of it into RAM on boot). Also they have already
decided that they will sail around that systemd/d-bus disaster, so you
can see how they cop
13 matches
Mail list logo
