[dev] obase - Sta.li moving forward?

Hi I was playing with packaging Christian's obase for Arch https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56826 and an easy-to-chroot package to complement it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59735 The idea I had was that one could use this environment as a gradual experimental environment t

Re: [dev] obase - Sta.li moving forward?

On 05/06/2012, Jens Staal wrote: > Hi > > I was playing with packaging Christian's obase for Arch > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56826 Thanks, never knew that before. > and an easy-to-chroot package to complement it > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59735 > > The idea I ha

Re: [dev] dwm window outline during mouse resize/move patch

Luis Anaya writes: > "John A. Grahor" writes: > >> Here is the patch for version 6.0. > Hi John: It worked like a charm, no compilation issues after patching and works as advertised. :). Now I have to move and compiled the patched source to my work system. Thanks! Luis -- Luis R. Anaya

[dev] Re: obase - Sta.li moving forward?

Jens Staal writes: > At the moment I have some issues with that the binaries refuse to be > 100% static The "musl" branch now properly builds static by default. Use bmake CC=musl-gcc when building the musl branch. -- Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.org